German Management v. CA (1989) Digest

“Landowner Bulldozed the Farmers’ Crops” G.R. No. 76217, Sept. 14, 1989 Parties: GERMAN MANAGEMENT & SERVICES, INC., petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS and ORLANDO GERNALE, ERNESTO VILLEZA, respondents. Facts Petitioner spouses are the owners of a parcel of land situated in Sitio Inarawan, San Isidro, Antipolo, Rizal. On February 26, 1982, the spouses Jose… Continue reading German Management v. CA (1989) Digest

Heirs of Clemente Ermac v. Heirs of Vicenta Ermac Digest

“Torrens System Does Not Vest Title” Respondents filed an action for quieting of title over a parcel of land denominated as Lot No. 666. According to respondents, the said lot belonged originally to Claudio Ermac and after his death, was inherited by his children — Esteban, Pedro and Balbina. Pedro and Balbina requested their brother… Continue reading Heirs of Clemente Ermac v. Heirs of Vicenta Ermac Digest

Forcible Entry vs. Unlawful Detainer | Ten Forty Realty v. Cruz

PARTIES:TEN FORTY REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT CORP., Represented by its President, VERONICA G. LORENZANA, petitioner, vs. MARINA CRUZ, respondent. GR NUMBER, DATEG.R. No. 151212, [September 10, 2003], 457 PHIL 603-620 MY TITLEDouble Sale, first possessor in good faith had a better right. FACTS Ten Forty, represented by Pres. Lorenzana, filed a complaint for ejectment against Marina… Continue reading Forcible Entry vs. Unlawful Detainer | Ten Forty Realty v. Cruz

Forcible entry vs. Unlawful Detainer

FORCIBLE ENTRY UNLAWFUL DETAINER How is possessed Possession of land or building by means of force, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth. (FITSS) one unlawfully withholds possession thereof after the expiration or termination of his right to hold possession under any contract, express or implied. Illegality illegal from the beginning the possession was originally lawful but… Continue reading Forcible entry vs. Unlawful Detainer

en_USEnglish