Lex Rex Ph

BASECO vs. PCGG Digest


BASECO (Bataan Shipyard and Engineering Co. Inc.) challenged the PCGG sequestration orders issued in accordance with EOs 1 and 2 of President Cory Aquino. PCGG was directed to (1) sequester the BASECO and 8 other companies with minimum disruption, (2) produce certain documents, (3) terminate services to BASECO executives. BASECO contends, among others, that such sequestration is a violation against its right against self-incrimination and unreasonable searches and seizures.


Is PCGG’s sequestration order against BASECO a violation of BASECO’s right against self-incrimination and unreasonable searches and seizures?



  1. Right against self-incrimination has no application to juridical persons.
    • Corporations cannot refuse incriminating questions because it is vested with special privileges and franchises by the government, and they must show their hand when charged.
    • Moreover, no search was undertaken by the PCGG, so BASECO cannot invoke its right against self-incrimination.
  2. Corporations are a creation of the State, for public benefit
    • Its rights are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation.
    • It would be a strange anomaly to hold that a state could not inquire whether its franchises/privileges granted were abused, and cannot demand the production of the corporate books and papers for that purpose.

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Brown-Araneta vs. Araneta

Facts Juan and Michelle were married and had 2 minor children. They separated and the children remained in Michelle’s custody. Juan filed for a Petition

Read More »


Vital role and trust involved “[t]he banking system has become an indispensable institution in the modern world and plays a vital role in the economic

Read More »

Grave abuse of discretion

Grave abuse of discretion connotes judgment exercised in a capricious and whimsical manner that is tantamount to lack of jurisdiction. To be considered ‘grave,’ discretion

Read More »