LexRex Logo

LexRex Ph

Bar Subject: Legal and Judicial Ethics

2017 Bar Examinations

2017 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q7

A. You had just taken your oath as a new lawyer. The secretary of a big university offered to get you as the university’s notary public. She explained that the faculty and students would be sent to you to have their documentations and affidavits notarized; and that the arrangement would be very lucrative for you. However, the secretary wants you to share with her half of your earnings throughout the year.
Will you agree to the arrangement proposed by the secretary of the university? Explain your answer. (4%)
B. The plaintiff died during the pendency of the case in the RTC. If you were the counsel of the plaintiff, what is the last duty you need to discharge in behalf of the late client before your professional engagement for the case may be deemed terminated? Explain briefly your answer. (4%)

Quick check

Under Canon III of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, may a lawyer share notarial fees with a non-lawyer?

Under Rule 3, Section 16 of the Rules of Court, within what period must a lawyer inform the court of his client's death?

What is the legal effect of a client's death on the attorney-client relationship in a pending civil action?

What specific information must a lawyer provide to the court upon informing it of the plaintiff's death?

Choices available with full access.

Why is fee-splitting with a university secretary in exchange for notarization referrals considered unethical?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Legal and Judicial Ethics answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Fee-Splitting Prohibition
Under Canon III of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA), a lawyer is strictly prohibited from sharing legal fees, including notarial fees, with non-lawyers. Legal fees represent compensation for professional legal services that only licensed members of the bar are qualified to render. Entering into a financial arrangement where a lawyer shares half of notarial earnings with a university secretary constitutes unlawful fee-splitting and commercialization of the legal profession.

2. Duty Upon Death
Under Rule 3, Section 16 of the Rules of Court, whenever a party to a pending action dies and the claim is not thereby extinguished, it is the mandatory duty of his counsel to inform the court within thirty days after such death. Counsel must also give the name and address of the deceased client's legal representative or heirs. This requirement ensures that the court maintains proper jurisdiction over the case.

3. Substitution of Parties
Upon the death of a client, the lawyer's agency and authority to act on behalf of the deceased client automatically terminate by operation of law. Counsel cannot continue actively prosecuting the case without proper substitution of parties by the court. By providing the names and addresses of the legal representatives, counsel enables the court to order the substitution of the deceased party and serve proper legal notices on the heirs.

TopicsDuty Upon Client Death1Fee-Splitting Prohibition1Substitution of Parties3

2017 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q8

A. Sancho Mahilig went to the office of Atty. Charm to engage her legal representation in the criminal case for adultery that the husband of his socialite friend had brought against him in the City Prosecutor’s Office in Manila. Atty. Charm thoroughly interviewed Sancho in her office with only Linda, the secretary/stenographer of Atty. Charm, the only other person present. On that occasion, Sancho candidly informed Atty. Charm about his illicit affair with the socialite wife, and gave many details. Linda faithfully recorded the interview.
During the trial of the criminal case for adultery, the trial prosecutor requested the court to issue a subpoena duces tecum to compel the production of the record of the interview and a subpoena ad testificandum to compel Linda to testify on the admission of the affair by Sancho. Atty. Charm objected to the request on the basis of lawyer-client confidentiality.
If you were the trial judge, how will you resolve the objection of Atty. Charm? Justify your answer. (4%)
B. Prosecutor Regan was designated to represent the State during the trial of an action to declare the nullity of a marriage. He realized soon enough, however, that the counsels of the parties were very competent and sincere in doing their work for their respective clients. Thus, Prosecutor Regan, mindful of his large caseload of preliminary investigations, and believing that his attendance at the trial was superfluous, decided not to attend the trial anymore so that he could devote more time to the work back in his office.
Explain whether or not the decision of Prosecutor Regan to miss the trial of the action to declare the nullity of the marriage was warranted. (4%)

Quick check

Does attorney-client privilege extend to an attorney's secretary or stenographer present during a consultation?

What is the legal status of an audio or written recording of a confidential interview made by a lawyer's stenographer?

Why is a public prosecutor required to actively attend trials in actions for nullity of marriage?

May a public prosecutor decide to skip trial in a marriage nullity case due to a heavy office workload?

Choices available with full access.

What should the trial court do when a prosecutor requests a subpoena duces tecum for privileged law firm interview notes?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Legal and Judicial Ethics answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Attorney-Client Privilege
Under Rule 130, Section 24(b) of the Rules of Court, an attorney cannot, without the consent of the client, be examined as to any communication made by the client to her or advice given thereon in the course of professional employment. This privilege protects confidential communications exchanged during legal consultations to ensure full and uninhibited disclosure between a client and legal counsel.

2. Extension to Stenographer
The attorney-client privilege extends expressly to an attorney's secretary, stenographer, or clerk. Under the law, an attorney's stenographer cannot be examined, without the consent of the client and the employer, concerning any fact the knowledge of which has been acquired in such capacity. Consequently, neither the testimony of the stenographer nor the written records of the confidential interview can be compelled or admitted in evidence.

3. Mandatory Prosecutor Attendance
Under the Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void Marriages and Annulment of Voidable Marriages (A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC), the public prosecutor is required to actively intervene and participate in all stages of trial. The prosecutor represents the State to prevent collusion between the parties and ensure that evidence is not fabricated. Heavy workload or the competence of private counsel does not justify or excuse the prosecutor's absence.

TopicsAttorney-Client Privilege10Extension to Stenographer1Mandatory Public Prosecutor Participation1

2017 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q9

Atty. Miriam rents her office space in a building owned by Winston. Eventually, Atty. Miriam became Winston’s regular legal counsel. Because of their good relationship, Atty. Miriam did not hesitate to borrow money from Winston. Atty. Miriam issued postdated checks covering the interest of her loans. Unfortunately, Atty. Miriam failed to pay her obligations to Winston. Her postdated checks with Winston also bounced. Hence, he filed a criminal case for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law against her.
In her counter-affidavit, Atty. Miriam averred that Winston was “a businessman who is engaged in the real estate business, trading and buy and sell of deficiency taxed imported cars, shark loans and other shady deals and has many cases pending in court.”
Hurt by the allegations, Winston filed a disbarment complaint against Atty. Miriam arguing that her allegations in the counter-affidavit constituted a breach of their confidential lawyer-client relationship.
Discuss whether or not the disclosures in Atty. Miriam’s counter-affidavit constitute a breach of fidelity towards her client. (4%)

Quick check

Under Canon III of the CPRA, what is the extent of a lawyer's duty to preserve client confidences?

When may a lawyer ethically disclose confidential information under the self-defense exception?

Why did Atty. Miriam's disclosures in her counter-affidavit constitute a breach of fidelity?

In a criminal prosecution for violation of the Bouncing Checks Law, what is the main issue?

Choices available with full access.

What is the consequence when a lawyer reveals irrelevant derogatory client secrets in a counter-affidavit?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Legal and Judicial Ethics answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Duty of Confidentiality
Under Canon III of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA), a lawyer owes undivided fidelity and confidentiality to the client. This obligation requires the lawyer to preserve all confidences, secrets, and information acquired within the scope of professional employment. The duty of confidentiality prevents the lawyer from disclosing derogatory, embarrassing, or prejudicial facts about the client, regardless of whether the information was obtained directly from the client or through independent sources during the representation.

2. Self-Defense Exception
A lawyer may disclose client confidences or secrets only under strictly limited exceptions, such as when necessary to collect legal fees or defend against an accusation of wrongful conduct by the client. However, this self-defense exception is narrow and permits disclosure of only those specific facts strictly essential to establish the defense. Revealing unnecessary or irrelevant derogatory allegations against the client exceeds the scope of permissible self-defense and constitutes an unethical breach of confidentiality.

3. Breach of Fidelity
Fidelity to a client requires a lawyer to advance the client's cause with loyalty, devotion, and utmost good faith. Filing a counter-affidavit containing gratuitous, irrelevant, and damaging accusations against a client—such as alleging loan sharking, tax evasion, or shady business deals—violates the duty of loyalty. Such disclosures demonstrate malice or bad faith, compromising the lawyer's professional standing and destroying the fundamental trust that underlines the attorney-client relationship.

TopicsAttorney-Client Privileged Disclosures1Breach of Fidelity1Duty of Confidentiality2

2017 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q10

Atty. Anna Kirmet was one of Worry Bank’s valued clients. The bank gave her a credit card with a credit limit of ₱250,000.00. Because of her extravagance, Atty. Kirmet exceeded her credit limit and refused to pay the monthly charges as they fell due.
Hence, aside from a collection case, Worry Bank filed a disbarment case against Atty. Kirmet. In her comment on the disbarment complaint, Atty. Kirmet insisted that she did not violate the Code of Professional Responsibility because her obligation to the bank was personal in nature and had no relation to her being a lawyer.
Is Atty. Kirmet correct? Explain your answer briefly. (4%)

Quick check

Does a lawyer's deliberate refusal to pay a personal credit card debt warrant administrative discipline?

What is required of a lawyer regarding good moral character under Canon II of the CPRA?

Can a lawyer avoid administrative liability by claiming her financial obligation was purely personal?

Why does persistent non-payment of just obligations subject an attorney to disbarment or suspension?

Choices available with full access.

Which body exercises disciplinary jurisdiction over lawyers for misconduct committed in their private lives?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Legal and Judicial Ethics answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Good Moral Character
Under Canon II of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA), good moral character is a continuing requirement for membership in the legal profession. A lawyer's conduct, whether in professional practice or private affairs, must conform to high ethical standards of honesty, integrity, and propriety. Misconduct committed in a private capacity still reflects adversely on a lawyer's fitness to practice law and erodes public confidence in the legal system.

2. Non-Payment of Debts
Deliberate and willful failure to pay just debts constitutes gross misconduct unbecoming of an officer of the court. While a lawyer's financial obligations may arise from purely personal or commercial transactions, persistently refusing to pay valid debts or evading financial responsibilities demonstrates a lack of integrity and moral scrupulousness. Consequently, administrative liability attaches regardless of whether the obligation arose from professional employment or personal affairs.

3. Private Life Propriety
The scope of judicial discipline extends beyond a lawyer's professional dealings with clients and courts to encompass personal conduct. Lawyers are held to a higher standard of propriety and financial responsibility than ordinary citizens. Claiming that an obligation is purely personal does not shield an attorney from administrative discipline when her private actions involve willful dishonesty, bad faith, or deliberate defiance of financial duties.

TopicsGood Moral Character2Lawyer Conduct1Non-Payment of Debts1

2017 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q11

A. Define champerty. (3%)
B. Atty. Andy and Atty. Valeriano were classmates in law school. As such, they developed a close friendly relationship. They agreed that they would refer clients to each other, and whoever referred clients would receive a commission or portion of the attorney’s fees. Atty. Andy referred a client to Atty. Valeriano, who charged the client ₱100,000.00 as initial attorney’s fees. Thereafter, Atty. Valeriano sent 15% of ₱100,000.00, or ₱15,000.00, to Atty. Andy as the latter’s referral fee.
Explain if the agreement on the referral fee is ethical. (3%)

Quick check

What is a champertous contract in the practice of law?

Why are champertous contracts considered void under Philippine law and ethical rules?

When is a division of attorney's fees between lawyers from different law firms ethically permissible?

Is a referral fee agreement where a lawyer receives fifteen percent of legal fees solely for referring a client ethical?

Choices available with full access.

What fundamental principle prohibits lawyers from charging commercial finder's fees for client referrals?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Legal and Judicial Ethics answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Champertous Contracts
Under Canon III of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA) and settled jurisprudence, a champertous contract is an agreement whereby a lawyer undertakes to carry on a litigation at his own expense in consideration of receiving a specified share of the property or proceeds recovered. Such contracts are void for being contrary to public policy because they encourage speculative litigation and turn lawyers into business partners in lawsuit outcomes.

2. Fee Division
Under the CPRA, a division of attorney's fees between lawyers who are not in the same law firm is permissible only when the division is made in proportion to the actual legal services performed and professional responsibility assumed by each lawyer. A mere referral of a client from one lawyer to another does not justify a fee division or referral commission without active participation or joint responsibility in handling the legal matter.

3. Referral Commissions
Accepting a referral fee or commission solely for recommending a lawyer to a client is strictly unethical. Legal fees represent compensation for professional legal services actually rendered, not finder's fees or commercial referral bonuses. Paying or receiving referral fees degrades the practice of law into a commercial transaction and undermines the fiduciary nature of the attorney-client relationship.

TopicsChampertous Contracts2Division of Attorney Fees1Referral Fee Ethics1