Lex Rex Ph

Alfredo Hilado et.al. vs. CA Digest

G.R. 164108

Facts

When Roberto Benedicto (RSB) died, his surviving spouse Julita filed and was granted by Manila RTC the issuance of the letters of administration. Julita was then ordered to submit a list of inventory of RSB’s estate and liabilities etc. In Sept. 2001, petitioners Hilado et al filed with the Manila RTC that they be furnished with all the copies and orders pertaining to the intestate proceedings, disputing their personality to intervene. Manila RTC denied Hilado’s motion, CA affirmed. 

Hilado et al argued that their right to intervene is supported not by right of intervention but by various rules on Special Proceedings.

Issue

Does Hilado et al have a right to intervene in the instant proceedings?

Ruling

No. 

Although the Rules on Special Proceedings entitle “any interested persons” or “any persons interested in the estate” to participate in varying capacities in the testate or intestate proceedings, however, it appears that the claims against Benedicto were based on tort, as they arose from his actions in connection with Philsucom, Nasutra, and Traders Royal Bank.

Hence, Section 2 of Rule 72 applies. It states that “the rules for ordinary actions shall be applicable in special proceedings.” 

Hence, Rule 19 Sec. 1 applies because it is a rule for ordinary actions. It provides that “a person who has a legal interest in the matter in litigation x x x be allowed to intervene in the action.” While this rule does not literally preclude Hilado et al, case law consistently held that such interest “must be actual and material, direct and immediate, and not simply contingent and expectant.” (Batama Farmers Coop vs. Hon. Rosal)

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Capital Gains Tax

Capital Gains Tax meaning is the final tax assessed on the presumed gain derived by citizens and resident aliens, as well as estates and trusts,

Read More »

Stare decisis

that once a question of law has been examined and decided, it should be deemed settled and closed to further argument. – Virtucio vs. Alegarbes

Read More »

Quintos vs. Beck Digest

Lessons: (1) The non-complying party is chiefly responsible to shoulder the expenses of returning the borrowed item; (2) A bailee must return all the things

Read More »

Lopez vs. Orosa Digest

“Material Man’s Lien Does Not Extend to Land” Petitioner FILED a petition against defendants on the grounds that as a creditor/material man of the building,

Read More »
en_USEnglish