Lex Rex Ph

Piczon vs. Piczon Digest


Sosing Lobos Corp obtained a loan from Consuelo (creditor). The president of the corporation, Esteban, signed an agreement expressing that he will pay the sum of P12,500 and agreed to pay with the interest of 12% per annum. He indicated that he is the president and guarantor of the said corporation.

Issue and Ruling

When should the 12% interest commence? (a) from when Consuelo et al made the first demand (Aug 6, 1964); or (b) from when the obligation becomes due and demandable? (Aug. 29, 1956)

From the date when the obligation becomes due and demandable. The court should adhere to the terms of the Agreement of Loan which plainly provides that “x x x 12% interest per annum xx x x commencing from the date of the execution thereof.”

Article 2209 of the Civil Code provides that in case the debtor delays in paying his obligations, the interest shall be that interest agreed upon. In the absence thereof, the legal interest. #NCC/2209

Is Esteban Piczon both a guarantor and surety?

No. Under the terms of the contract, Annex A, Esteban only expressly bound himself as guarantor, not as surety. A guaranty must be express (Article 2055), and it would be violative of the law to consider other obligations if the party only bound himself as “guarantor.”

Class Notes

There is more protection in a guarantor. When there is ambiguity, the law will lean on the side that has less burden on the party – in this case, as a guarantor instead of a surety. 

When you draft a contract of a guaranty, make sure that there is no ambiguity that will confuse the contract to be that of a surety rather than a guaranty. 

The law states that the guarantee must be expressed and cannot be basically deduced from the transactions of the parties. It must be explicitly expressed in the document itself.

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Criminal Negligence

Imprudence is an act of carelessness (reckless imprudence) which, had it been intentional, would otherwise constitute a felony (Article 365 of RPC): If grave felony: Arresto mayor max to prision correccional medium

Read More »

Cruz v. De Leon

“Possessor Must Be Respected and Protected” GR No. and Date: 6546, Juan 15, 1912Ponente: TorresParties: Gregoria Cruz et. al. vs. Domingo De Leon et. al. (about 30) Facts In Aug 1907, Cruz

Read More »

People vs. Santiago

Lesson: The consent in the marriage given after the rape done was not validly given. Marriage was a mere ruse to cover up the crime committed. Facts On November 23, 1926, the

Read More »

PAFLU vs. Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) Digest

72 SCRA 396 FULL TEXT: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/jan1989/gr_79347_1989.html PARTIES: PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS (SEPTEMBER CONVENTION), petitioner,vs.DIRECTOR PURA FERRER CALLEJA of the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR),Kalipunan ng Manggagawang Pilipino (KATIPUNAN)Malayang Samahan ng

Read More »