Lex Rex Ph

Lao vs. Lao Digest (Oct. 2008)

Lao vs. Lao, G.R. No. 170585, October 6, 2008


Petitioners David Lao et al filed with the SEC against respondent Dionision Lao, president of Pacific Foundry Shop Corp (PFSC) praying that the former be declared as stockholders and directors of PFSC. Petitioners claimed that they are stockholders based on GIS filed with the SEC, and Respondent Lao is estopped from contesting the GIS. However, petitioners Lao have no certificates of shares in their name.


Whether mere inclusion of petitioners in the GIS of a corp constitutes as a sufficient proof that they are shareholders of the company.


No. GIS is an insufficient proof. A CoS is the evidence of a holder’s interest and status in the corporation. It is prima facie evidence that the holder is a shareholder of a corporation.  Other evidence: AOI, STB, Minutes of Meeting, Sec. Certficate

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Question of Fact

There is a question of fact when the doubt or difference arises as to the truth or falsehood of facts or when the query invites

Read More »

Chi Ming Tsoi v CA Digest

“Love is Useless Unless Shared” CHI MING TSOI, petitioner,vs.COURT OF APPEALS and GINA LAO-TSOI, respondents. IN RELATION TO COURSE: Persons under Psychological Incapacity, Nullity of

Read More »

Trust Fund Doctrine

Trust Fund Doctrine considers the subscribed capital as a trust fund for the payment of debts of the corporation to which the creditors may look

Read More »

Liyao vs. Liyao Digest

G.R. No. 138961. March 7, 2002 Facts William Liyao Jr. filed an action for compulsory recognition as the illegitimate son of William Liyao. Corazon, the

Read More »