Lex Rex Ph

Geluz vs. CA and Lazo

G.R. No. L-16439 


Nita Villanueva voluntarily procured abortion three times with Geluz as the physician. She did it without the consent of her husband. Upon knowing the last abortion, Oscar Lazo filed for damages against Dr. Geluz. Trial court awarded damages to the husband. CA affirmed.

Issue and Ruling:

Can the husband recover damages against the physician who caused the abortion?

No. The husband’s usage of Article 2206 of the New Civil Code is misplaced. It does not cover an unborn fetus. The father cannot act on behalf of the dead child. The conceived child only has a provisional personality but no juridical personality. Therefore, a father cannot claim damages in behalf of the aborted child.

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Legal Standing or Locus Standi

A personal stake in the outcome of the controversy which: Assures the concrete adverseness Sharoens the presentation of the issues Illuminates the court for difficult

Read More »


Possession of moral integrity is of greater importance than possession of legal learning. The practice of law is a privilege bestowed only on the morally

Read More »

PAFLU vs. Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) Digest

72 SCRA 396 FULL TEXT: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/jan1989/gr_79347_1989.html PARTIES: PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS (SEPTEMBER CONVENTION), petitioner,vs.DIRECTOR PURA FERRER CALLEJA of the Bureau of Labor Relations

Read More »

Boyer vs. Roxas Digest

July 14, 1992 Facts Petitioner Heirs of Eugenia Roxas Inc. prayed for the ejectment of Rebecca Boyer-Roxas and Guillermo Roxas from buildings inside the Hidden

Read More »

Republic v. Lao Digest

“Agricultural and Alienable” Alexandra Lao filed for an application for registration of title over a parcel of land consisting of 9,349 sqm. Alexandra Lao (R)

Read More »