Geluz vs. CA and Lazo

Issue and Ruling:

Can the husband recover damages against the physician who caused the abortion?

No. The husband’s usage of Article 2206 of the New Civil Code is misplaced. It does not cover an unborn fetus. The father cannot act on behalf of the dead child. The conceived child only has a provisional personality but no juridical personality. Therefore, a father cannot claim damages in behalf of the aborted child.

Donation Inter Vivos vs. Mortis Causa

November 23, 2021

How to Ascertain Designation of the deed of donation must be construed together with the rest of the instrument, in order to give effect to

Boyer vs. Roxas Digest

March 29, 2022

July 14, 1992 Facts Petitioner Heirs of Eugenia Roxas Inc. prayed for the ejectment of Rebecca Boyer-Roxas and Guillermo Roxas from buildings inside the Hidden

Seven Guidelines for Psychological Incapacity based on Republic vs. Molina

October 1, 2022

Basis: Court’s ruling on Republic vs. Molina 1. Burden of proof to the plaintiff Any doubt should be resolved in favor of the existence and

Ago vs. CA Digest

October 2, 2021

“When Machines Become Real Property” GR 17898; Oct. 31, 1962 PARTIES:Pastor D. Ago, petitioner vs. Hon. CA, Hon. Ortiza Judge of CFI Agusan, Provincial Sheriff

Macadangdang vs. CA and Mejias Digest

June 9, 2022

The legitimacy of children must not be left at the mercy of the passions, jealousy or anger of their parents. Facts Respondent Elizabeth Mejias was

Life vs Property

January 27, 2022

The right to life is more sacred than a mere owning a property. That is not to encourage x x x theft, but merely to

Lex Rex Ph