Lex Rex Ph

DBP vs. NLRC

GR86227
January 19, 1994

Facts

Atlas is a textile firm. Malayang Samahan is its employee union. Atlas hypothecated its certain assets to DBP but Atlas defaulted. DBP acquired the assets of Atlas by foreclosure.

Malayang Samahan filed their claim against Atlas and DBP.

Lower Courts/Judicial Bodies:

  • Labor Arbiter ruled that DBP and Atlas Textile Dev Corp (Atlas) are liable to Malayan Samahan for illegal salary deductions, separation pay, and similar money claims
  • NLRC affirmed Labor Arbiter

DBP sought reversal of the NLRC decision before the Supreme Court. DBP contends that its mortgage lien should not cover the workers’ preference under Article 110 of the Labor Code.

Issue and Ruling

Does the mortgage lien of DBP cover the the workers’ preference under Article 110 of the Labor Code? No.

Article 110 provides: “In the event of bankruptcy … of an employer’s business, his workers shall enjoy first preference as regards their wages and other monetary claims, …Such unpaid wages and monetary claims shall be paid in full before claims of the government …may be paid. (As amended by Section 1, Republic Act No. 6715, March 21, 1989)

First, Article 110 of the labor Code cannot be viewed in isolation but must be read in relation to the Civil Code scheme on classification and preference of credits.

Second, In the same way that Insolvency Law has been harmonized with the Civil Code, so must Labor Law be made the same.

Third, in the event of insolvency, there must be liquidation proceedings to effect equitable distribution of the insolvent’s property to his creditors.

Fourth, a preference of credit is not the same as a lien. A preference of credits does not attach to specific properties. liens create a charge on a particular property. Article 110 is not a lien on the property of the insolvent’s debtor (Atlas in this case), It is only a preference of credits on their favor.

Fifth, even if Article 110 be interpreted as absolute, it must not infringe the constitutional guarantee of non-impairment of contracts. Also the mortgage credit of DBP happened before the promulgation of RA 6715 which expanded worker preference to cover not only unpaid wages but also monetary claims.

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Literal Interpretation

When Samson (his long hair cut by Delilah) was captured, the procurator placed an iron rod burning white-hot two or three inches away from in front of Samson’s eyes. This blinded the

Read More »

Respect

One unavoidable consequence of everyone having the freedom to choose is that others may make different choices – choices we would not make for ourselves, choices we may disapprove of, even choices

Read More »

Proceeding quasi in rem

A proceeding quasi in rem is one brought against persons seeking to subject the property of such persons to the discharge of the claims assailed.61 In an action quasi in rem, an

Read More »

Jocson v. CA Digest

Jocson vs. CA 170 SCRA 333G.R. No. L-55322. February 16, 1989Full Text Link Complete Names of PartiesMOISES JOCSON, petitioner,vs.HON. COURT OF APPEALS, AGUSTINA JOCSON-VASQUEZ, ERNESTO VASQUEZ, respondents. THESIS STATEMENTPetitioner Moises FILED a case to

Read More »

Chua Keng Giap vs TAC

When the mother herself denies someone as her son, no one else, even the Supreme Court, can question that. It is only her who knows if that person came out from her

Read More »

Cortes vs. Yu-Tibo Digest

My Title: My Windows Were Covered by My Neighbor Facts The house of the plaintiff Maximo in Calle Rosario, house No. 65, has certain windows therein, through which it receives light and

Read More »
en_USEnglish