Lex Rex Ph


any person who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been legally dissolved, or before the absent spouse has been declared presumptively dead by means of a judgment rendered in the proper proceedings. (Article 349 RPC)

When will someone be guilty of bigamy?

  • while the previous marriage of one or the other is valid and subsisting;
  • before the former marriage has been legally dissolved;
  • before the absent spouse has been judicially declared as presumptively dead.

Bigamy is not similar to the crimes of adultery and concubinage which requires that the culprits, if both are alive, should he prosecuted or included in the information.

People v. Nepomuceno

Will the second spouse be guilty?

In the crime of bigamy, the second spouse that married the accused may not be persecuted if she married the accused without being aware of his previous marriage. Only if the second spouse had knowledge of the previous undissolved marriage of the accused could she be included in the information as a co-accused.

Bigamy is a public offense and a crime against status, while adultery and concubinage are private offenses and are crimes against chastity.

People v. Nepomuceno

Pardon will not extinguish

In adultery and concubinage, pardon by the offended party will bar the prosecution of the case, which is not so in bigamy. In bigamy, pardon by the offended spouse will not bar the prosecution of the case. (People v. Nepomuceno)

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Proceeding quasi in rem

A proceeding quasi in rem is one brought against persons seeking to subject the property of such persons to the discharge of the claims assailed.61 In an action quasi in rem, an

Read More »

Chi Ming Tsoi v CA Digest

“Love is Useless Unless Shared” CHI MING TSOI, petitioner,vs.COURT OF APPEALS and GINA LAO-TSOI, respondents. IN RELATION TO COURSE: Persons under Psychological Incapacity, Nullity of marriage by reason of protracted avoidance of

Read More »

Portuguez vs. GSIS (2007)

Doctrines Facts The petitioner, Ricardo Portuguez, alleged that he was discriminated against by the GSIS Family Bank in terms of payment of salary and grant of benefits and allowances. He claimed that

Read More »

Andaya vs. People Digest

Facts The case involves a criminal complaint against Noe S. Andaya, who was the president and general manager of the Armed Forces and Police Savings and Loan Association, Inc. (AFPSLAI). Andaya sought

Read More »