In the May 2013 elections, the Allied Workers’ Group of the Philippines (AWGP), representing land-based and sea-based workers in the Philippines and overseas, won in the party list congressional elections. Atty. Abling, a labor lawyer, is its nominee.
As part of the party’s advocacy and services, Congressman Abling engages in labor counseling, particularly for local workers with claims against their employers and for those who need representation in collective bargaining negotiations with employers. When labor cases arise, AWGP enters its appearance in representation of the workers and the Congressman makes it a point to be there to accompany the workers, although a retained counsel also formally enters his appearance and is invariably there. Congressman Abling largely takes a passive role in the proceedings although he occasionally speaks to supplement the retained counsel’s statements. It is otherwise in CBA negotiations where he actively participates.
Management lawyers, feeling that a congressman should not actively participate in cases before labor tribunals and before employers because of the influence a congressman can wield, filed a disbarment case against the Congressman before the Supreme Court for his violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility and for breach of trust, in relation particularly with the prohibitions on legislators under the Constitution.
Is the cited ground for disbarment meritorious? (6%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Yes, the cited ground for disbarment is meritorious, although suspension rather than disbarment is the appropriate penalty. Under Section 14, Article VI of the Constitution and Puyat vs De Guzman, Members of
Unlock the full Political Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Section 14, Article VI of the 1987 Constitution, before which bodies are Members of Congress prohibited from personally appearing as counsel?
Section 14 of Article VI prohibits Members of Congress from personally appearing as counsel before any court, electoral tribunal, or administrative body.
Under Puyat v. De Guzman, how does the Supreme Court treat a legislator's indirect or passive appearance in court or administrative proceedings?
Indirect or passive appearance by a legislator before tribunals is prohibited because their official presence creates undue influence.
What constitutes the practice of law according to Philippine jurisprudence regarding lawyer-legislators?
The practice of law includes legal counseling, advice, and active representation in negotiations like CBA conferences.
Why does the Constitution prohibit lawyer-legislators from practicing before quasi-judicial and administrative tribunals?
Choices available with full access.
What is the appropriate disciplinary penalty for a lawyer-legislator who violates the constitutional prohibition on personal appearance before administrative bodies?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Prohibition on Appearance
Under Section 14, Article VI of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and Puyat v. De Guzman, no Senator or Member of the House of Representatives may personally appear as counsel before any court of justice, electoral tribunal, or quasi-judicial and administrative body. The constitutional prohibition against personal appearance aims to prevent legislators from exerting undue political influence over courts and administrative tribunals. This prohibition applies even if the legislator acts without compensation or purports to take a passive role, because their official presence naturally influences adjudicators.
2. Practice of Law
The practice of law is not limited to appearing in court or conducting litigation. Under settled jurisprudence, practice of law encompasses legal advice, counseling, representation, and participating in legal negotiations such as collective bargaining agreement (CBA) negotiations. A lawyer-legislator who actively participates in CBA negotiations or represents parties before administrative bodies is actively practicing law. Combining legislative office with active legal representation in adversary proceedings violates constitutional inhibitions and ethical standards governing the legal profession.
3. Disciplinary Liability Scope
A lawyer who violates constitutional prohibitions on legislative practice of law breaches the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountabilities. While a violation warrants disciplinary sanction, disbarment is reserved for gross misconduct, moral turpitude, or willful deceit. Where a legislator engages in impermissible practice or appearance before administrative tribunals, the Supreme Court typically imposes the penalty of suspension from the practice of law rather than disbarment. Disciplinary penalties aim to uphold legal ethics while maintaining proportionality to the severity of the offense.