2010 Political Law, Q18

The House Committee on Appropriations conducted an inquiry in aid of legislation into alleged irregular and anomalous disbursements of the Countrywide Development Fund (CDF) and Congressional Initiative Allocation (CIA) of Congressmen as exposed by X, a Division Chief of the Department of Budget and Management (DBM). Implicated in the questionable disbursements are high officials of the Palace. The House Committee summoned X and the DBM Secretary to appear and testify. X refused to appear, while the Secretary appeared but refused to testify invoking executive privilege.
May X be compelled to appear and testify? If yes, what sanction may be imposed on him? (2%)
Is the Budget Secretary shielded by executive privilege from responding to the inquiries of the House Committee? Explain briefly. If the answer is no, is there any sanction that may be imposed upon him? (3%)

Quick check

Who holds the constitutional authority to invoke executive privilege during a congressional inquiry?

What sanction may Congress impose on a witness who refuses to appear or testify during a legislative inquiry?

Can a subordinate executive official independently claim executive privilege to refuse a legislative subpoena?

Under Article VI, Section 21 of the Constitution, what is required for a valid legislative inquiry?

Choices available with full access.

What is the legal effect when a summoned executive official refuses to answer legislative inquiries without a valid claim of privilege?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Legislative Inquiry Power
Under Article VI, Section 21 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, Congress and its committees possess inherent and broad powers to conduct inquiries in aid of legislation. To effectively fulfill its legislative mandate, Congress is vested with compulsory process to issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents. Witnesses summoned in legislative investigations cannot refuse to appear or testify without valid legal justification, as full compliance with congressional summonses is essential for legislative fact-finding and public oversight.

2. Executive Privilege Scope
Executive privilege protects confidential presidential communications, state secrets, and diplomatic negotiations from public or legislative disclosure. Under Senate v. Ermita, executive privilege is recognized as an exception to legislative power but must be explicitly invoked by the President or the Executive Secretary by order of the President. Subordinate executive officials, such as department secretaries or division chiefs, cannot independently claim executive privilege to refuse congressional summonses or withhold testimony without clear presidential authorization.

3. Congressional Contempt Power
Congress possesses inherent authority to punish contumacious witnesses who refuse to obey legislative subpoenas or answer proper inquiries. When a summoned witness refuses to appear or testify during a legitimate inquiry in aid of legislation, Congress may cite the witness in contempt and order their arrest and detention. This contempt power serves to enforce legislative processes and preserve the dignity, authority, and constitutional functions of the legislature during investigations.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026