During his campaign sortie in Barangay Salamanca, Mayor Galicia was arrested at a PNP checkpoint for carrying highpowered firearms in his car. He was charged and convicted for violation of the COMELEC gun ban. He did not appeal his conviction and instead applied for executive clemency. Acting on the favorable recommendation of the Board of Pardons and Parole, the President granted him pardon. Is he eligible to run again for an elective position? Explain briefly. (5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Mayor Galicia is not eligible to run again for an elective position. Under Article IX-C, Section 5 of the Constitution and Risos-Vidal v COMELEC, no pardon for violation of election laws shall be
Unlock the full Political Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What constitutional prerequisite is required for the President to grant a valid pardon for an election law violation?
Article IX-C, Section 5 of the Constitution requires a favorable recommendation from COMELEC before granting executive clemency for election offenses.
What is the legal status of a presidential pardon granted for an election offense without COMELEC's recommendation?
A pardon granted without the constitutionally mandated COMELEC recommendation is void and fails to restore political rights.
Under Risos-Vidal v. COMELEC, who holds the constitutional authority to recommend executive clemency for election offenses?
The Commission on Elections holds exclusive constitutional authority to recommend executive clemency for violations of election laws.
Why does conviction for a violation of the COMELEC gun ban disqualify a person from running for elective office?
Choices available with full access.
What is the effect of an invalid executive pardon on a candidate's statutory disqualification from office?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Presidential Pardoning Power
Under Article VII, Section 19 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, the President possesses the executive power to grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons after conviction by final judgment. However, this executive prerogative is not unlimited and remains subject to specific constitutional limitations. Executive clemency extended to individuals convicted of crimes must comply strictly with constitutional conditions precedent, including mandatory agency recommendations required by law, to be legally valid and effective in restoring civil and political rights.
2. COMELEC Recommendation Requirement
Article IX-C, Section 5 of the Constitution mandates that no pardon, amnesty, parole, or suspension of sentence for violation of election laws, rules, and regulations shall be granted by the President without the favorable recommendation of the Commission on Elections. As affirmed in Risos-Vidal v. COMELEC, this requirement acts as a constitutional check on executive clemency. Any presidential pardon issued for an election offense without COMELEC's favorable recommendation is void and produces no legal effect.
3. Disqualification of Candidates
Under the Omnibus Election Code and the Local Government Code, conviction by final judgment for an election offense disqualifies an individual from running for or holding any public office. Because a void executive pardon fails to erase the legal effects of a final conviction, the disqualified individual remains barred from seeking elective office. Only a valid pardon issued in full compliance with constitutional prerequisites can restore an offender's eligibility to run for public office.