Lex Rex Ph

Bambalan vs. Maramba Digest


Bambalan signed a document executing a transfer of land of ownership to Maramba. After some time, Bambalan then asserted that the transfer was invalid for the following reasons: (1) Bambalan was a minor; (2) Record shows that it was not his intention to sell the land. Maramba argues that the doctrine in Mercado vs. Espiritu should apply. In that case, the plaintiff pretended to be of age and the contract was validated.


Will the minor Bambalan’s act validate the sale of land?


No, the transfer of ownership is invalid because of the minority of Bambalan. First, the ruling in Mercado vs. Espiritu is premised on the fact that the (a) minor pretended to be an adult; and (b) the contracting party did not know that they are dealing with a minor. Here, Maramba knew that Bambalan was a minor, and Bambalan did not pretend. Moreover, even if the contract was valid, the transaction is still invalid because it did not adhere to the provisions of section 50 of the Act. No. 496, wherein the register of deeds must give validity to the contracts.

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Janice Marie Jao vs. CA (1987)

Topics: DNA Testing, Paternity Test Facts Petitioner, represented by her mother Arlene Salgado, filed a case for recognition and support against Perico V. Jao. Perico denied the paternity so they agreed to

Read More »

Actions in personam

In actions in personam, the judgment is for or against a person directly. Jurisdiction over the parties is required in actions in personam because they seek to impose personal responsibility or liability

Read More »

Fernando v. St. Scholastica’s College Digest

“Unreasonable Ordinance” Fernando v. St. Scholastica’s CollegeGR Number 161107. March 12, 2013 Complete Names of PartiesHon. Ma. Lourdes Fernando, in her capacity as Mayor of Marikina, Chief of Permit Division, City Engineer,

Read More »

Turner vs. Lorenzo Shipping Digest

GR 157479November 24, 2010 Facts The spouses Turners are stockholders of Lorenzo Shipping Corp. When the Corp decided to amend its Articles to remove the stockholders’ pre-emptive rights to newly-issued shares of

Read More »