Lex Rex Ph

Arenas vs. Raymundo Digest

March 13, 1911


Arenas et al delivered their jewelry to Perello for the latter to sell on commission. Instead of selling, Perello pledged the jewelry to the pawnshop of Raymundo, and appropriated the money. Perello was then sentenced with estafa. The pawnshop owner/pledgee, Raymundo, still possessed the jewelry of Arenas and refused to return the deliver the jewelry to the sheriff as requested by the owner Arenas. Hence, Arenas filed a suit against the pawnshop owner.

Raymundo prayed that the complaint be dismissed and argued that the jewelry were pledged to him by Perello as a security for a the loan (P1,524); and that one of the sons of the jewelry owner, Gabriel La O, mediated in the pawning transaction.

RTC: Pawnshop owner Raymundo must restore the jewelry to the owner, with reservation of the pawnshop owner’s right to file a case against the proper party (i.e. Perello).

Raymundo filed a bill of exception. Arenas filed an action for replevin.

CA: Affirmed RTC.

Issue and Ruling:

Should Raymundo return the jewelry to the rightful owner although he loaned money to the embezzler? Yes.

  1. It did not acquire the jewelry in public auction, although it acquire it in good faith;
  1. The real owner of the jewelry did not enter into contract with the pledgee pawnshop. In a pledge, the pledgor must be the real owner; Under Article 2185 of NCC, the pledgor must be the absolute owner of the thing pledged.
  2. It is unreasonable to oblige the real jewelry owner to (a) lose his property or (b) pay for it twice (first, by purchasing it; second, by redeeming it);
  3. The pawnshop released all the loan money to the “estafador” or embezzler and nothing on the party of the owner;
  4. Pawnshops are constantly receiving security for loans. Hence, they are expected by law to exercise more diligence.

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Romualdez-Marcos vs. COMELEC Digest

After the exile of the Marcoses, can Imelda run for public office? Facts In 1995, Imelda Marcos filed her Certificate of Candidacy for the position of Representative of the First District of

Read More »

Casupanan vs. Laroya Digest

Lesson: The accused can file a separate civil action for quasi-delict – Rule 111 Sec. 1 Par. 6 Facts Lesson: The accused can file a separate civil action for quasi-delict – Rule

Read More »


Agreed and decided to commit. Conspiracy exists when two or more persons come to an agreement concern the commission of a felony and decide to commit it. Article 8 of the Revised Penal

Read More »

Unrestricted Retained Earnings (URE)

Unrestricted Retained Earnings (URE) are the accumulated profits and gains realized out of the normal and continuous operations of the company after deducting therefrom the distributions of stockholders (legal capital) and transfers

Read More »