Lex Rex Ph

Andal vs. Macaraig Digest

G.R. No. L-2474. May 30, 1951


Petitioner Mariano Andal filed for recovery of the ownership and possession of a parcel of land in Camarines Sur on the ground that he is the surviving son of Emiliano Andal and Maria Duenas.  Mariano argues that the land was acquired by Emiliano from his mother, respondent Eduvigis Macaraig, by donation propter nuptias.  However, the legitimacy of Mariano was questioned in this case on the ground that Emiliano was sick of tuberculosis from January 1941 until he became disabled in September 1942. Since May 1942, Maria and Felix, the brother of Emiliano, are having an adulterous relationship. In June 1943, Maria gave birth to Mariano Andal the petitioner.


Is the child legitimate?


Yes. Mariano Andal is presumed to be the legitimate son because he was born within three hundred days following the dissolution of the marriage [Article 108 of Civil Code]. That presumption can only be rebutted by proof that it was physically impossible for the husband to have had access to his wife during the first 120 days of the 300 next preceding the birth of the child. 

Birth of Mariano300 days preceding Mariano’s birthWas Emiliano still sexually capable?
June 1943Around August 1942Yes. He only became disabled in September 1942 (He has still one month to impregnate his wife and TB is not a hindrance)

The fact that the wife committed adultery cannot overcome this presumption.  Although the husband was already suffering from tuberculosis… that is no evidence of impotency, nor does it prevent carnal intercourse. “the reputation of the tuberculous towards eroticism (sexual propensity) is probably dependent more upon confinement to bed than the consequences of the disease.” -Hyman

Note: This 300/180 computation might be obsolete because of the scientific method of proving filiation: DNA Testing

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Bambalan vs. Maramba Digest

Facts Bambalan signed a document executing a transfer of land of ownership to Maramba. After some time, Bambalan then asserted that the transfer was invalid for the following reasons: (1) Bambalan was

Read More »

Continuous vs. Discontinuous Easements

Element Continuous Discontinuous Use Incessant Intervals or intermittent Usage by human interruption No Yes Establishment Human action Human action Exercise No human action Needs human action Example The easement of drainage, and

Read More »

DBP vs. Hydro Resources (HRCC) Digest

Facts DBP and PNB foreclosed NMIC’s properties which made the former as the majority stockholder of the latter. NMIC then engaged the services of Hercon/HRCC. NMIC failed to pay Hercon/HRCC. After default

Read More »

YHT Realty vs. CA Digest

Topic: Necessary deposits Facts McLoughlin, an Australian businessman, stayed in Tropicana hotel from 1984 to 1987. He rented a safety deposit box which could be opened by the use of 2 keys:

Read More »

Onas vs. Javillo Digest

Onas vs. Javillo 59 Phil 733G.R. No. L-39670             March 20, 1934Full Text Link Complete Names of PartiesIn the matter of the intestate estate of the deceased Crispulo Javillo.ROSARIO OÑAS, oppositor-appellant,vs.CONSOLACION JAVILLO, ET AL.,

Read More »