Full text Parties:ZOILA MENDEZ, RAFAEL MENDEZ, and MATILDE BIONSON, petitioners,vs.MAXIMO, EUGENIA JUANA, FORTUNATA, PRUDENCIA, ROMAN, ANECITA and MARIA, all surnamed BIONSON and HON. ALFREDO C. LAYA, Judge, Court of First of Cebu,…
Guerrero vs. RTC Case Digest
Facts: Plaintiff Guerrero assails the decision of respondent RTC judge for dismissing the case on the grounds that there was “no earnest effort for ammicable settlement or compromise” between petitioner and respondent,…
Hontiveros vs. RTC Case Digest
Parties: Agusto and Maria HontiverosvsGregorio Hontiveros and Teodora Ayson This is a case against brothers (Agusto and Gregorio). Petitioner filed a complaint for damages against respondents Gregorio Hontiveros and Teodora Ayson on…
Tañada vs. Tuvera Case Digest
Facts: On 24 April 1985, the Court affirmed the necessity for the publication to the OfficialGazette all unpublished presidential issuances which are of general application, and unless so published, they shall have…
Speluncean Explorers: Hypotethical Legal Opinion
Legal Writing Assignment: Write your legal opinion on the Speluncean ExplorersSubmitted during my First Year in Law School I hold that these men are not guilty because the phrase “willingly take the…
Termination of Employees under the Labor Code
Questions answered in this video:
Transpo Law Review Philippines
Common Carriers and Vigilance over Goods (3) Transpo Law Review: Safety of Passengers & Bill of Lading
Overhearing through Telephone Extension is not Wiretapping | Gaanan vs. IAC Digest
In 1975, the complainant and his lawyer called defendant Laconico and discussed the withdrawal of the complaint they filed against Laconico. Defendant Laconico requested Atty Gaanan to secretly listen to the phone…
English