Lex Rex Ph

Forum Shopping

Forum shopping is the institution of two or more actions involving the same parties for the same cause of action either simultaneously or successively, on the suspension that one or the other court would come out with a favorable disposition.

The test for determining whether there is forum shopping is where the elements of litis pendentia are present or where a final judgment in one case will amount to res judicata in the other.

The evil to be avoided by the rule against forum shopping is→the rendition by two competent tribunals of two separate and contradictory decisions, thereby causing confusion, which is present in this case.

: Brown-Araneta vs. Araneta

Three ways of committing forum shopping

  1. Filing multiple cases based on the same cause of action and with the same prayer, the previous case not having been resolved (litis pendentia);
  2. Filing multiple cases based on the same cause of action and with the same prayer, the previous case having been resolved with finality (res judicata);
  3. and Filing multiple cases based on the same causes of action but with different prayers (splitting causes of action (In re: Ferrer, A.C. No. 8037, Feb. 17, 2016).

Other Content You May Be Interested In:

Dividends

These are surplus corporate profits (coming from unrestricted retained earnings) which are [SDD] set apart, declared, and ordered to be distributed to stockholders. Profits are

Read More »

Stocks vs. Bonds

Stocks Bonds Nature A unit of ownership of the company A loan to the company Profits over time Intended to appreciate in value through time

Read More »

Newsweek vs. IAC

Facts In 1981, the respondent association of sugarcane planters filed a class suit in representation of 8,500 members alleging libel against Newsweek Inc., and two

Read More »

People vs. Mendoza Digest

Full text Lesson: A bigamous marriage need no judicial decree of nullity. Facts Arturo Mendoza was sentenced by the CFI guilty of bigamy and sentencing him

Read More »
en_USEnglish