2024 Political Law, Q13

In June 2024, Carina, a private citizen, filed a verified impeachment complaint against the Vice President of the Philippines for culpable violation of the Constitution and betrayal of public trust. The impeachment complaint was referred to the House of Representatives Committee on Justice. In July 2024, the House of Representatives approved the report of the Committee on Justice dismissing the impeachment complaint due to the absence of resolution or endorsement of any Member of the House of Representatives. In August 2024, a party- list representative filed a second verified impeachment complaint against the Vice President based on the same facts and grounds as the first complaint. In September 2024, the second impeachment complaint was referred to the Committee on Justice. The Vice President moved to dismiss the second complaint arguing that no impeachment proceeding can be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year. May the second impeachment complaint be dismissed for violation of the one-year bar rule? Explain.

Quick check

May the second impeachment complaint be dismissed for violating the one-year bar rule?

According to Francisco v. House of Representatives, when is an impeachment proceeding deemed "initiated"?

What is required for a verified impeachment complaint filed by a private citizen to be validly acted upon by the House?

What is the primary purpose of the one-year bar rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the 1987 Constitution?

Choices available with full access.

Why did Carina's complaint fail to trigger the constitutional one-year bar rule against subsequent impeachment filings?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Initiation of Impeachment
Under Article XI, Section 3 of the 1987 Constitution, an impeachment proceeding is initiated by the filing of a valid impeachment complaint coupled with its referral to the House Committee on Justice. As ruled in Francisco v. House of Representatives, initiation takes place upon referral of a validly filed complaint. For a complaint filed by a private citizen to be constitutionally valid, it must be accompanied by a resolution or endorsement of a Member of the House of Representatives. An unendorsed citizen's complaint is void and legally non-existent for the purpose of initiating impeachment proceedings.

2. One-Year Bar Rule
Article XI, Section 3(5) of the 1987 Constitution provides that no impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year. The purpose of this constitutional limitation is to prevent harassment of impeachable officials and to preserve government stability. However, the one-year prohibition is triggered only by the initiation of a valid impeachment proceeding. A defective or unendorsed citizen's complaint that fails to legally initiate an impeachment proceeding does not activate the one-year bar against subsequent valid complaints.

3. Endorsement Requirement
A verified impeachment complaint filed by any citizen under Section 3(2), Article XI of the Constitution requires the endorsement or resolution of a Member of the House of Representatives to be acted upon. Without such endorsement, the complaint lacks legal efficacy and cannot be validly referred or processed as an initiation of impeachment. Dismissal of an unendorsed complaint due to the absence of a legislator's endorsement confirms its invalidity, ensuring that only endorsed or member-filed complaints count as the single permissible initiation within the constitutional one-year timeframe.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026