2022 Political Law, Q9

During a press conference, President Acosta explained that the Executive Department can temporarily take over the operation of any privately owned public utility or business affected with public interest to address the shortage of hospital beds occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic. She invokes Article XII, Section 17 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which provides that: “In times of national emergency, when the public interest so requires, the State may, during the emergency and under reasonable terms prescribed by it, temporarily take over or direct the operation of any privately owned public utility or business affected with public interest.” Is President Acosta correct? Explain briefly. (5 points)

Quick check

Is President Acosta correct in unilaterally taking over private hospital operations during a national emergency?

Under Section 23(2), Article VI of the 1987 Constitution, who possesses the primary authority to grant emergency powers?

Which landmark Supreme Court ruling held that emergency takeover powers require legislative delegation from Congress?

What is required before the President may validly take over a privately owned business affected with public interest under Article XII, Section 17?

Choices available with full access.

Does the President's power to declare a state of national emergency automatically include the power to take over private public utilities?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Emergency Powers Delegation
Under Section 23(2), Article VI of the 1987 Constitution, in times of war or other national emergency, Congress may by law authorize the President to exercise powers necessary and proper to carry out a declared national policy. Emergency powers, including the temporary takeover of public utilities or businesses affected with public interest, belong inherently to the Legislature. The President cannot exercise emergency takeover authority under Article XII, Section 17 without a statutory grant of delegated power from Congress that specifies the duration and reasonable terms of such exercise.

2. Takeover Power Distinction
In David versus Macapagal-Arroyo, the Supreme Court distinguished the President's constitutional authority to declare a state of national emergency from the exercise of emergency powers. While the President as Commander-in-Chief may independently proclaim a national emergency, taking over privately owned public utilities or businesses affected with public interest under Article XII, Section 17 requires prior legislative authorization. Without an enabling statute enacted by Congress, any unilateral executive order or administrative directive mandating the temporary takeover of private hospital facilities or commercial enterprises remains unconstitutional and void.

3. Public Utility Regulation
Article XII, Section 17 of the 1987 Constitution permits the State to temporarily take over or direct the operation of privately owned public utilities or businesses affected with public interest during national emergencies. However, the term 'State' in this provision refers to the sovereign power exercised primarily through the legislative branch. Because taking over private property restricts fundamental property rights, the constitutional requirement that the takeover be conducted 'under reasonable terms prescribed by it' demands that Congress enact defining guidelines, compensation standards, and operational limits before executive implementation.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026