2020-21 The Law Pertaining to the State and Its Relationship with Its Citizens, Q12

The United Nations General Assembly unanimously passed a Resolution expressing the commitment of its members to pass law and related policies that would provide incentives for all citizens of the planet to change their lifestyles so that the impending disasters brought about by climate change can be avoided or mitigated. As the principal legal adviser of the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, you are asked this query: Is this General Assembly Resolution a valid source of State obligation under international law? Explain briefly.

Quick check

Is a unanimously passed UN General Assembly Resolution a valid source of State obligation under international law?

Under Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, what are the two required elements of customary international law?

What is the general legal status of United Nations General Assembly resolutions under international law?

What does the Latin concept 'opinio juris sive necessitatis' signify in international law?

Choices available with full access.

How can a non-binding international resolution become a valid source of binding State obligation?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Soft Law Declarations
Under traditional international law, United Nations General Assembly resolutions are generally non-binding recommendations that lack direct legislative force. Unlike binding treaties or Security Council decisions under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, General Assembly declarations operate primarily as soft law instruments. However, when an international resolution achieves unanimous approval or consensus among member States, it can evidence widespread state practice and opinio juris. Such unanimous resolutions contribute significantly to the progressive development of international law, serving as evidence of emerging customary norms or generally accepted legal principles.

2. Customary International Law
According to Article 38 of the International Court of Justice Statute, international custom is recognized as a primary source of international law. Customary international law requires two constituent elements: widespread, consistent state practice and opinio juris sive necessitatis, which is the psychological belief that such practice is rendered obligatory by law. Unanimous adoption of a General Assembly resolution by all sovereign States manifests collective state intention and opinio juris. Consequently, a normative declaration endorsed without dissent establishes a binding customary international obligation upon member States.

3. Opinio Juris Consensus
Opinio juris represents the legal conviction of States that a particular conduct or standard is required by international law. While non-binding in form, General Assembly resolutions passed unanimously by the international community reflect an express binding consensus regarding universal legal principles. In environmental and climate law, unanimous resolutions committing States to statutory action establish international obligations derived from general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. Therefore, a unanimously approved General Assembly resolution serves as a valid, authoritative source of State obligation under international law.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026