2018 Remedial Law, Q15

Atty. Dalmacio, the Director of the National Bureau of Investigation, applied for a search warrant before the Executive Judge of RTC Manila. He alleged in his application that a certain alias Django was keeping about 10 kilos of shabu in a wooden cabinet located at Dillian’s Store in Paseo de Sta. Rosa, Laguna. The Executive Judge of Manila personally examined Atty. Dalmacio and his witnesses and thereafter issued the search warrant particularly describing the place to be
searched and the items to be seized.
(a) Can the search warrant issued by the Executive Judge of Manila be enforced in Laguna? (2.5%)
(b) Can the legal concept of “venue is jurisdictional” be validly raised in applications for search warrants? (2.5%)

Quick check

Can a search warrant issued by an Executive Judge of RTC Manila upon application by the NBI Director be enforced in Laguna?

Why is the principle 'venue is jurisdictional' inapplicable to search warrant applications?

Which law enforcement officials are authorized to apply for nationwide search warrants under A.M. No. 99-20-09-SC?

What is the procedural nature of an application for a search warrant under Rule 126?

Choices available with full access.

Which trial courts possess special authority to issue nationwide search warrants for heinous crimes and illegal drugs?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Search Warrant Venue
Under Rule 126 of the Rules of Court and A.M. No. 99-20-09-SC, Executive Judges of the Regional Trial Courts of Manila and Quezon City have special authority to act on search warrant applications filed by the National Bureau of Investigation or Philippine National Police for heinous crimes and dangerous drugs. Search warrants issued pursuant to this special authority are enforceable nationwide. Consequently, a search warrant issued by an Executive Judge of RTC Manila for a drug offense in Laguna is valid and enforceable.

2. Nature of Application
An application for a search warrant is a special criminal process and a judicial search order, not a criminal action. Unlike criminal prosecutions where venue is jurisdictional because the court acquires jurisdiction over the offense based on the place where the crime was committed, venue in a search warrant application is purely procedural. Because search warrant proceedings do not try or adjudicate criminal liability, the principle that venue is jurisdictional cannot be raised to invalidate a search warrant issued by a competent court.

3. Executive Judge Authority
Under Supreme Court administrative guidelines, specific Executive Judges are granted expanded territorial authority to issue search warrants for compelling law enforcement reasons. When law enforcement agencies like the National Bureau of Investigation file applications involving major offenses like illegal drugs, the designated Executive Judges may issue warrants to be served outside their territorial jurisdiction. This statutory exception ensures effective prosecution of organized criminal activities without being restricted by traditional judicial territorial boundaries.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026