2017 Political Law, Q11

Sec. 17, Art. VI of the Constitution establishes an Electoral Tribunal for each of the Houses of Congress, and makes each Electoral Tribunal “the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of their respective Members.” On the other hand, Sec. 2(1), C (Commission on Elections), Art. IX of the Constitution grants to the COMELEC the power to enforce and administer all laws and regulations “relative to the conduct of an election, plebiscite, initiative, referendum, and recall.”
Considering that there is no concurrence of jurisdiction between the Electoral Tribunals and the COMELEC, state when the jurisdiction of the Electoral Tribunals begins, and the COMELEC’s jurisdiction ends. Explain your answer. (4%)

Quick check

When does the exclusive jurisdiction of the Electoral Tribunal over a congressional candidate begin?

Which body holds exclusive jurisdiction over election contests involving a sitting Member of Congress?

What is the legal effect on COMELEC's jurisdiction when a proclaimed candidate takes a proper oath and assumes office?

If a candidate is proclaimed and takes an oath but has not yet assumed office because the term has not started, which body retains jurisdiction?

Choices available with full access.

Why is there no concurrence of jurisdiction between the Electoral Tribunals and COMELEC?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Requisites For Jurisdiction
Under Article VI, Section 17 of the 1987 Constitution, the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) and the Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET) are the sole judges of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of their respective Members. For an Electoral Tribunal to acquire exclusive jurisdiction over a candidate, three requisites must concur: a valid proclamation, a proper oath of office, and actual assumption of office. Until all three conditions are satisfied, the winning candidate is not considered a Member of Congress, and the Commission on Elections retains full jurisdiction over election-related disputes.

2. Exclusive Jurisdiction Boundary
The jurisdiction of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and the Electoral Tribunals is mutually exclusive and non-concurrent. COMELEC exercises authority over all pre-proclamation controversies, disqualification petitions, and election disputes prior to the concurrence of proclamation, oath-taking, and assumption of office. The moment these three requisites concur, COMELEC is divested of jurisdiction over the candidate's election, returns, and qualifications. Any pending pre-proclamation contest or disqualification case before COMELEC is rendered moot or transferred to the exclusive jurisdiction of the appropriate Electoral Tribunal, preserving the constitutional separation of powers.

3. Member Status Benchmark
A candidate becomes a official Member of Congress only upon the simultaneous fulfillment of proclamation, taking a valid oath, and assuming office on the constitutionally designated date. If a candidate has been proclaimed and sworn into office but the official term of office has not yet commenced, the individual is not yet a Member of Congress. Consequently, COMELEC retains jurisdiction to resolve pending disqualification petitions or annul proclamations during this interim window. Only upon the arrival of the statutory term start date does the candidate assume office, thereby vesting sole jurisdiction in the Electoral Tribunal.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026