2017 Mercantile Law, Q6

A. Hortencio owned a modest grocery business in Laguna. Because of the economic downturn, he incurred huge financial liabilities. He remained afloat only because of the properties inherited from his parents who had both come from landed families in Laguna. His main creditor was Puresilver Company (Puresilver), the principal supplier of the merchandise sold in his store. To secure his credit with Puresilver, he executed a real estate mortgage with a dragnet clause involving his family’s assets worth several millions of pesos.
Nonetheless, Hortencio, while generally in the black, now faces a situation where he is unable to pay his liabilities as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. What will you advise him to do to resolve his dire financial condition? Explain your answer. (5%)
B. Wyatt, an internet entrepreneur, engaged in a sideline business of creating computer programs for selected clients on a per project basis and for servicing basic computer problems of his friends and family members. His main job was being an IT consultant at Futurex Co., a local computer company.
Because of his ill-advised investments in the stock market and the fraud perpetrated against him by his trusted confidante, Wyatt was already drowning in debt, that is, he had far more liabilities than his entire assets.
What legal recourse remained available to Wyatt? Explain your answer. (5%)

Quick check

Under Section 94 of the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act, when may an individual debtor file for suspension of payments?

What is the proper legal remedy under Section 103 of R.A. No. 10142 for an individual debtor whose liabilities exceed his assets?

Why is suspension of payments the appropriate remedy for Hortencio under the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act?

Why is voluntary liquidation the appropriate legal recourse for Wyatt?

Choices available with full access.

Which primary statute governs suspension of payments, individual liquidation, and court-supervised rehabilitation in the Philippines?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Suspension of Payments
Under Section 94 of the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010 (Republic Act Number 10142), an individual debtor who possesses sufficient property to cover all his debts but foresees the impossibility of meeting them when they respectively fall due may file a petition for suspension of payments. This court-supervised procedure allows an illiquid individual debtor to petition the court for a temporary suspension of payments and a stay of execution proceedings while agreeing with creditors on a feasible payment schedule or debt adjustment plan, thereby protecting his solvent assets from premature liquidation.

2. Voluntary Insolvency Liquidation
Under Section 103 of Republic Act Number 10142, an individual debtor whose liabilities exceed his total assets and who is financially insolvent may file a petition for voluntary liquidation with the Regional Trial Court. The filing of the petition establishes an act of insolvency, leading to the liquidation of the debtor's non-exempt assets by a court-appointed liquidator for equitable distribution among creditors. Upon completion of the liquidation proceedings and distribution of assets, the insolvent individual debtor obtains a full discharge from all dischargeable debts and financial liabilities.

3. Sole Proprietorship Rehabilitation
Under Section 12 of the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act, a sole proprietorship registered with the Department of Trade and Industry may petition for court-supervised corporate rehabilitation if it meets the statutory criteria of a debtor enterprise. While individual debtors generally utilize suspension of payments or voluntary liquidation, a sole proprietorship operating an ongoing commercial business may seek financial rehabilitation to suspend claims and restructure its commercial obligations under a court-approved rehabilitation plan, provided it demonstrates operational viability.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026