2017 Mercantile Law, Q5

A. Under the Nell Doctrine, so called because it was first pronounced by the Supreme Court in the 1965 ruling in Nell v. Pacific Farms, Inc. (15 SCRA 415), the general rule is that where one corporation sells or otherwise transfers all of its assets to another corporation, the latter is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the transferor.
State the exceptions to the Nell Doctrine. (4%)
B. Santorini Corporation (Santorini) was in dire straits. In order to firm up its financial standing, it agreed to entertain the merger and takeover offer of Proficient Corporation (Proficient), the leading company in their line of business. Erica, the major stockholder of Santorini, strongly opposed the merger and takeover. The matter of the merger and takeover by Proficient was included in the agenda of the next meeting of Santorini’s Board of Directors. However, owing to Erica’s serious illness that required her to seek urgent medical treatment and care in Singapore, she failed to attend the meeting and was consequently unable to cast her vote. The Board of Directors approved the merger and takeover. At the time of the meeting, Santorini had been in the red for a number of years owing to its recurring business losses and reverses.
Erica seeks your legal advice regarding her right as a stockholder opposed to the corporate action. Explain your answer. (4%)
C. Samito is the President and a Director of Lucky Bank (Lucky}, a commercial bank holding its main office in Makati. His brother, Othello, owned a big fishing business based in Malabon. Othello applied for a loan of PSO Million with Lucky. Othello followed the ordinary banking procedures in all the stages of the processing of his application. When required, he made the necessary arrangements to guarantee the loan. Thus, in addition to the real estate mortgage, Othello executed a joint and solidary suretyship, issued postdated checks, and submitted all other requirements prescribed by Lucky.
When the loan application was about to be approved and the proceeds released, BG Company, a keen competitor of Othello in the fishing industry, wrote to the Board of Directors and the management of Lucky questioning the loan on the ground of conflict of interest due to Samito and Othello being brothers, citing the legal restriction against bank exposure of directors, officers, stockholders or their related interests (DOSRI).
(a) What are the three restrictions imposed by law on DOSRI transactions? (4%)
(b) Is BG Company’s opposition based on conflict of interest and violation of the restrictions on DOSRI transactions legally and factually correct? Explain your answer. (4%)

Quick check

Under the Nell Doctrine, when does an asset-buyer corporation become liable for the transferor's corporate debts?

What condition must a dissenting stockholder satisfy to validly exercise her appraisal right in a corporate merger?

What are the three main statutory restrictions imposed on DOSRI transactions under Section 36 of R.A. No. 8791?

Why is BG Company's opposition to Othello's loan application based on DOSRI restrictions legally unmeritorious?

Which primary statutes govern corporate mergers, appraisal rights, and bank DOSRI restrictions in the Philippines?

Learn more about these topics

1. Nell Doctrine Exceptions
Under the Nell Doctrine established in jurisprudence and the Revised Corporation Code, a corporation that purchases or acquires all the assets of another corporation is generally not liable for the seller's liabilities. However, four well-defined exceptions exist where liability attaches: first, where the purchasing corporation expressly or impliedly agrees to assume such debts; second, where the transaction amounts to a consolidation or merger; third, where the buyer corporation is a mere continuation of the seller corporation; and fourth, where the transaction is fraudulently entered into to escape liability for corporate obligations.

2. Stockholder Appraisal Right
Under Section 80 and Section 81 of the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (Republic Act Number 11232), a stockholder has the right to dissent and demand payment of the fair value of his shares in specific major corporate actions, including a merger or consolidation. To validly exercise this appraisal right, the stockholder must have voted against the proposed corporate action or submitted a written dissent. If a stockholder fails to attend the meeting or cast a vote against the merger due to illness or absence, she must submit a formal written dissent to preserve her appraisal right.

3. DOSRI Loan Restrictions
Under Section 36 of the General Banking Law of 2000 (Republic Act Number 8791), directors, officers, stockholders, and their related interests (DOSRI) are subject to three strict legal restrictions: procedural approval by the majority of the board of directors excluding the borrowing director, individual and aggregate ceiling limits on total accommodation, and arm's-length commercial terms. Related interests include a director's spouse and relatives within the first degree of consanguinity or affinity. A sibling, being a second-degree relative, is not covered under statutory DOSRI rules unless BSP rules apply.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026