2016 Political Law, Q16

Jojo filed a criminal complaint against Art for theft of a backpack worth P150.00 with the Office of the City Prosecutor of Manila. The crime is punishable with arresto mayor to prision correccional in its minimum period, or not to exceed 4 years and 2 months. The case was assigned to Prosecutor Tristan and he applied Sec. 8(a) of Rule 112 which reads: “(a) If filed with the prosecutor. – If the complaint is filed directly with the prosecutor involving an offense punishable by imprisonment of less than four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day, the procedure outlined in Sec. 3(a) of this Rule shall be observed. The Prosecutor shall act on the complaint within ten (10) days from its filing.”
On the other hand, Sec. 3(a) of Rule 112 provides: “(a) The complaint shall state the address of the respondent and shall be accompanied by affidavits of the complainant and his witnesses as well as other supporting documents to establish probable cause. x x x”
Since Sec. 8(a) authorizes the Prosecutor to decide the complaint on the basis of the affidavits and other supporting documents submitted by the complainant, Prosecutor Tristan did not notify Art nor require him to submit a counter-affidavit. He proceeded to file the Information against Art with the Metropolitan Trial Court. Art vehemently assails Sec. 8(a) of Rule 112 as unconstitutional and violative of due process and his rights as an accused under the Constitution for he was not informed of the complaint nor was he given the opportunity to raise his defenses thereto before the Information was filed. Rule on the constitutionality of Sec. 8(a) of Rule 112. Explain. (5%)

Quick check

Is the right to a preliminary investigation a constitutional right or a statutory privilege?

Under Section 8(a) of Rule 112 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, when may a preliminary investigation be dispensed with?

Why does the lack of a preliminary investigation for minor offenses not violate the constitutional guarantee of due process?

What is the primary purpose of a preliminary investigation in Philippine criminal procedure?

Choices available with full access.

Which body possesses the constitutional power to promulgate rules concerning pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Political Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Statutory Privilege
The right to a preliminary investigation is a statutory privilege granted by law rather than a constitutional right. Because it is purely a creation of statute, procedural rules promulgated by the Supreme Court may modify, restrict, or dispense with preliminary investigations for minor offenses. Denying a preliminary investigation in cases where the law does not explicitly mandate one does not violate the Constitution.

2. Procedural Due Process
Procedural due process in criminal cases requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before an impartial tribunal. In summary proceedings or cases where preliminary investigation is dispensed with, due process is not denied because the accused is afforded a full opportunity to present evidence and raise all defenses during the trial before the court. Due process is satisfied as long as a fair trial is guaranteed.

3. Summary Procedure
Under Section 8(a) of Rule 112 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, offenses punishable by imprisonment of less than four years, two months, and one day do not require a formal preliminary investigation prior to filing an Information. The public prosecutor acts directly on the complaint based on supporting affidavits. This summary procedure aims to expedite the disposition of minor criminal cases without sacrificing the constitutional rights of the accused.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026