2016 Labor Law, Q19

Filmore Corporation was ordered to pay P49 million to its employees by the Labor Arbiter. It interposed an appeal by filing a Notice of Appeal and paid the corresponding appeal fee. However, instead of filing the required appeal bond equivalent to the total amount of the monetary award, Filmore filed a Motion to Reduce the Appeal Bond to P4,000,000.00 but submitted a surety bond in the amount of P4.9 million. Filmore cited financial difficulties as justification for its inability to post the appeal bond in full owing to the shutdown of its operations. It submitted its audited financial statements showing a loss of P40 million in the previous year. To show its good faith, Filmore also filed its Memorandum of Appeal.
The NLRC dismissed the appeal for non-perfection on the ground that · posting of an appeal bond equivalent to the monetary award is indispensable for the perfection of the appeal and the reduction of the appeal bond, absent any showing of meritorious ground to justify the same, is not warranted. Is the dismissal of the appeal correct? Explain. (5%)

Quick check

What is the general requirement under Article 229 of the Labor Code regarding the posting of an appeal bond in cases involving a monetary award?

Under the McBurnie v. Ganzon doctrine, what is the minimum required amount for a provisional bond accompanying a motion to reduce the appeal bond?

What is the legal effect of filing a motion to reduce the appeal bond accompanied by the requisite ten percent provisional bond?

What must the NLRC do if it denies an employer's motion to reduce the appeal bond or deems the provisional bond insufficient?

Choices available with full access.

Which of the following constitutes a meritorious ground for requesting a reduction of the appeal bond under NLRC rules?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Labor Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Appeal Bond Requirement
Under Article 229 of the Labor Code, an appeal from a decision of the Labor Arbiter involving a monetary award is perfected only upon the posting of a cash or surety bond issued by a reputable bonding company accredited by the Supreme Court. The bond must be in an amount equivalent to the monetary award adjudged to the employee. The posting of an appeal bond is a mandatory statutory requirement intended to assure the workers that if they finally prevail in the case, the monetary award will be satisfied out of the bond.

2. Appeal Bond Reduction
Under current labor rules and the landmark doctrine in McBurnie v. Ganzon, the NLRC may allow the reduction of the appeal bond upon motion of the appellant on meritorious grounds and upon posting of a provisional bond. The provisional bond must be equivalent to at least ten percent of the monetary award, excluding damages and attorney's fees. Meritorious grounds include severe financial distress, operational shutdown, or substantial legal issues raised in the appeal, supported by audited financial statements or official corporate filings.

3. Appeal Period Suspension
Filing a motion to reduce the appeal bond accompanied by the required provisional bond of at least ten percent provisionally suspends the running of the ten-day reglementary period to perfect the appeal. The NLRC is required to resolve the motion and determine the reasonableness of the bond posted. If the NLRC denies the motion or requires an additional bond, it must grant the appellant a fresh period of ten calendar days from receipt of the denial order to post the full or balance bond.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026