Empire Brands (Empire) contracted the services of Style Corporation (Style) for the marketing and promotion of its clothing line. Under the contract, Style provided Empire with Trade Merchandising Representatives (TMRs) whose services began on September 15, 2004 and ended on June 6, 2007, when Empire terminated the promotions contract with Style.
Empire then entered into an agreement for manpower supply with Wave Human Resources (Wave). Wave owns its condo office, owns equipment for the use by the TMRs, and has assets amounting to Pl,000,000.00. Wave provided the supervisors who supervised the TMRs, who, in tum, received orders from the Marketing Director of Empire. In their agreement, the parties stipulated that Wave shall be liable for the wages and salaries of its employees or workers, including benefits, and protection due them, as well as remittance to the proper government entities of all withholding taxes, Social Security Service, and Philhealth premiums, in accordance with relevant laws.
As the TMRs wanted to continue working at Empire, they submitted job applications as TMRs with Wave. Consequently, Wave hired them for a term of five (5) months, or from June 7, 2007 to November 6, 2007, specifically to promote Empire’s products.
When the TMRs’ 5-month contracts with Wave were about to expire, they sought renewal thereof, but were refused. Their contracts with Wave were no longer renewed as Empire hired another agency. This prompted them to file complaints for illegal dismissal, regularization, non-payment of service incentive leave and 13th month pay against Empire and Wave.
[a] Are the TMRs employees of Empire? (2.5%)
[b] Were the TMRs illegally dismissed by Wave? (2.5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
[a] Yes, the TMRs are employees of Empire. [b] No, the TMRs were not illegally dismissed by Wave. Under labor law, a contractor lacking substantial capital that supplies workers performing tasks integral to the principal's business is a
Unlock the full Labor Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Which condition establishes labor-only contracting under Philippine labor law?
A contractor that supplies workers performing tasks integral to the principal's main business without substantial capital acts as a labor-only contractor.
What is the legal effect when a principal engages a labor-only contractor to supply workers?
In labor-only contracting, the principal is legally treated as the direct employer of the workers.
When is a fixed-term employment contract void under labor jurisprudence?
Fixed-term employment contracts designed to defeat security of tenure and regular employment are void ab initio.
What factor demonstrates that an employer-employee relationship exists between a principal and contracted workers?
Choices available with full access.
What is the legal consequence of a manpower agency's non-renewal of a void fixed-term contract with regular workers of the principal?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Labor-Only Contracting
Labor-only contracting occurs when a contractor supplies workers to a principal without having substantial capital or investment in tools and equipment, or where the workers perform activities directly related to the principal's main business. In such cases, the law treats the contractor as a mere agent, and the principal becomes the direct employer of the contracted workers. Consequently, the principal assumes full liability for all statutory wages, benefits, and employment rights, while the contracted workers acquire regular employment status directly with the principal company.
2. Fixed-Term Employment
Fixed-term employment contracts are valid only if entered into knowingly and voluntarily without moral dominance or intent to circumvent security of tenure. When workers have already attained regular employment status under a principal through an initial labor-only contracting scheme, subsequently subjecting them to short fixed-term contracts with a new manpower agency is void ab initio. Employment contracts structured primarily to deny workers their accrued security of tenure violate public policy and are legally ineffective in altering established regular employment status.
3. Security of Tenure
Security of tenure is a constitutionally guaranteed right protecting workers against dismissal without just or authorized cause and procedural due process. Where a principal exercises direct control over contracted workers through its marketing executives, an employer-employee relationship subsists directly between the principal and the workers. Non-renewal of a void fixed-term contract by an intermediary manpower agency cannot terminate this regular employment relationship, rendering the principal solely responsible for respecting the workers' security of tenure.