2015 Legal and Judicial Ethics, Q16

Atty. Luna Tek maintains an account in the social media network called Twitter and has 1,000 followers there, including fellow lawyers and some clients. Her Twitter account is public so even her non-followers could see and read her posts, which are called tweets. She oftentimes takes to Twitter to vent about her daily sources of stress like traffic or to comment about current events. She also tweets her disagreement and disgust with the decisions of the Supreme Court by insulting and blatantly cursing the individual Justices and the Court as an institution.
a. Does Atty. Luna Tek act in a manner consistent with the Code of Professional Responsibility? Explain the reasons for your answer. (3%)
b. Describe the relationship between a lawyer and the courts. (3%)

Quick check

Does a lawyer's duty to observe respect toward courts apply to posts made on social media platforms like Twitter?

Under the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, how should a lawyer express disagreement with judicial decisions?

What is the nature of the relationship between a lawyer and the courts under legal ethics?

Why is publicly insulting and cursing Supreme Court Justices on Twitter considered professional misconduct?

Choices available with full access.

May a lawyer defend vulgar public tweets against judges by claiming the right to free speech?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Respect Toward Courts
Under Canon II, Sections 1 and 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, a lawyer owes a fundamental duty of respect, courtesy, and dignity toward courts and judicial officers. While lawyers retain the right to express legitimate criticism of judicial rulings, such criticism must be submitted through respectful legal channels and framed in dignified language. Blatant insult, vulgarity, and offensive personal attacks against judges or the judicial institution degrade public confidence in the rule of law and constitute serious professional misconduct.

2. Social Media Conduct
The ethical standards governing legal professionals apply with equal force to online communications and social media platforms. Postings on public social media networks like Twitter are accessible to a broad audience and cannot be treated as private or informal venting. Lawyers are bound to maintain professional dignity, self-restraint, and respect in their digital interactions. Cursing or insulting members of the judiciary on public social media violates the rules of legal ethics, subjecting the attorney to administrative disciplinary sanctions.

3. Officer of Court
A lawyer is first and foremost an officer of the court who assists in the administration of justice. This status establishes a special fiduciary relationship with judicial tribunals, requiring lawyers to uphold the authority, independence, and dignity of the courts. While an attorney must zealously advocate for client interests, this obligation is subordinate to the lawyer's primary duty as an officer of the court to foster public respect for the judicial system and observe dignified decorum at all times.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026