2014 Remedial Law, Q4

An order of the court requiring a retroactive re-dating of an order, judgment or document filing be entered or recorded in a judgment is: (1%)
(A) pro hac vice
(B) non pro tunc
(C) confession relicta verificatione
(D) nolle prosequi

Quick check

What is the primary purpose of a nunc pro tunc judgment or order issued by a trial court?

Can a court use a nunc pro tunc order to alter or modify the substantive terms of a final judgment?

What does the Latin procedural phrase "pro hac vice" mean when used in judicial rulings?

Which of the following describes the legal concept of "nolle prosequi" in criminal procedure?

From what date does a valid nunc pro tunc order take legal effect?

Learn more about these topics

1. Nunc Pro Tunc
A nunc pro tunc order is issued by a court to record a prior judicial act that was actually performed but omitted from the formal record through inadvertence or mistake. Its purpose is to make the record speak the truth as of the date the judicial action was actually taken. A nunc pro tunc order cannot be used to modify, alter, or reverse a judgment, nor can it supply judicial action that was not actually rendered at the earlier date.

2. Scope of Correction
The office of a nunc pro tunc entry is restricted to placing upon the record evidence of a judicial action that was previously made but not properly entered. It operates retroactively to the date when the judgment or order was originally rendered. Courts cannot use a nunc pro tunc order to correct judicial errors, supply omitted judicial conclusions, or alter substantive rights of the parties after a judgment has attained finality.

3. Common Legal Terms
Understanding Latin procedural maxims is essential in Philippine remedial law. Aside from nunc pro tunc, terms such as pro hac vice refer to rulings made for a particular occasion without creating precedent, while nolle prosequi signifies a formal entry by the prosecution declaring that a criminal case will not be further prosecuted. Recognizing these distinctions ensures precise application of procedural remedies and judicial orders during litigation.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026