2014 Criminal Law, Q11

A, in a public place, fired his gun at B with the intention of killing B, but the gun did not fire because the bullet is a dud. The crime is: (1%)
(A) attempted homicide
(B) grave threat
(C) impossible crime
(D) alarm and scandal

Quick check

What crime is committed when a person fires a gun at another with intent to kill, but the bullet fails to explode because it is a dud?

Under Article 4(2) of the Revised Penal Code, what are the two types of impossibility that characterize an impossible crime?

Why does pulling the trigger of a firearm loaded with a dud bullet NOT constitute attempted homicide?

What is the primary rationale behind penalizing an impossible crime under the Revised Penal Code?

Choices available with full access.

Which element is indispensable for an act to be classified as an impossible crime under Article 4(2) RPC?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Criminal Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Impossible Crime
Under Article 4, paragraph 2 of the Revised Penal Code, an impossible crime is committed by any person performing an act which would be an offense against persons or property, were it not for the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment or on account of the employment of inadequate or ineffectual means. The penalty for an impossible crime is imposed to punish the criminal propensity or dangerous demeanor of the offender, even though no actual harm or felony against persons or property was successfully consummated.

2. Ineffectual Means
Under Article 4(2) of the Revised Penal Code, ineffectual means refer to instruments, devices, or methods employed by an offender that are inherently incapable of producing the intended unlawful result. Pulling the trigger of a firearm loaded with a defective or dud cartridge is a classic illustration of employing ineffectual means. Because the bullet cannot detonate or discharge, the intended killing of the victim cannot be physically accomplished, converting what would have been attempted homicide into an impossible crime.

3. Inherent Impossibility
Under Philippine criminal law, inherent impossibility in an impossible crime may be either legal or physical. Physical impossibility occurs when an extraneous circumstance unknown to the actor prevents the accomplishment of the intended crime against persons or property. When an offender aims and fires a handgun at a targeted victim with intent to kill, but the weapon fails to discharge solely due to a dud bullet, physical impossibility prevents the consummation of the felony.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026