2014 Civil Law, Q7

Due to the continuous heavy rainfall, the major streets in Manila became flooded. This compelled Cris to check-in at Square One Hotel. As soon as Crisgot off from his Toyota Altis, the Hotel’s parking attendant got the key of his car and gave him a valet parking customer’s claim stub. The attendant parked his car at the basement of the hotel. Early in the morning, Cris was informed by the hotel manager that his car was carnapped. (4%)
(A) What contract, if any, was perfected between Cris and the Hotel when Cris surrendered the key of his car to the Hotel’s parking attendant?
(B) What is the liability, if any, of the Hotel for the loss of Cris’ car?

Quick check

Under Articles 1998 and 1999 of the Civil Code, what contract is perfected when a hotel guest surrenders car keys to a valet attendant?

Under Article 2001 of the Civil Code, when does theft or carnapping exempt a hotelkeeper from liability for lost guest property?

What is the legal effect of a disclaimer printed on a valet claim stub stating the hotel is not liable for vehicle loss?

Why is Square One Hotel liable to Cris for the carnapping of his Toyota Altis from the basement parking?

Choices available with full access.

What degree of diligence is required of hotelkeepers in caring for vehicles deposited by checked-in guests?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Necessary Deposit Rules
Under Articles 1962, 1998, and 1999 of the Civil Code, a necessary deposit is constituted when a guest surrenders control and possession of personal effects, including motor vehicles, to a hotelkeeper or authorized hotel employees. The hotelkeeper's responsibility begins from the moment the vehicle is delivered to the hotel's valet parking attendant. The relationship creates a statutory obligation on the part of the hotel to exercise due diligence in safely keeping and returning the deposited vehicle to the guest upon presentation of the claim stub.

2. Hotelkeeper Liability Scope
Under Article 2001 of the Civil Code, the loss of deposited property through theft or carnapping does not automatically exempt the hotelkeeper from civil liability. To escape liability, the loss must result from a fortuitous event involving force majeure, such as theft committed with arms or irresistible force. Unless armed robbery or overwhelming physical force is proven, the hotel is presumed negligent and remains fully liable for the value of the lost motor vehicle, regardless of any exculpatory notice printed on the parking stub.

3. Valet Service Nature
Valet parking services provided by hotels to checked-in guests are not simple lease of parking spaces, but form an integral part of the hotel's necessary deposit contract. By accepting the vehicle keys and issuing a valet claim stub, the hotel assumes custody and control of the car. Any contract stipulation or posted disclaimer attempting to diminish or waive the hotelkeeper's statutory liability for loss of or damage to guests' vehicles is void for being contrary to law and public policy.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026