2014 Civil Law, Q6

Miko and Dinah started to live together as husband and wife without the benefit of marriage in 1984. Ten (10) years after, they separated. In 1996, they decided to live together again, and in 1998, they got married.
On February 17, 2001, Dinah filed a complaint for declaration of nullity of her marriage with Miko on the ground of psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code. The court rendered the following decision:
“1. Declaring the marriage null and void;
2. Dissolving the regime of absolute community of property; and
3. Declaring that a decree of absolute nullity of marriage shall only be issued after liquidation, partition and distribution of the parties’ properties under Article 147 of the Family Code.”
Dinah filed a motion for partial reconsideration questioning the portion of the decision on the issuance of a decree of nullity of marriage only after the liquidation, partition and distribution of properties under Article 147 of the Code.
If you are the judge, how will you decide petitioner’s motion for partial reconsideration? Why? (4%)

Quick check

Under Article 50 of the Family Code, to which void or voidable marriages does the requirement of prior property liquidation before decree issuance apply?

What legal regime governs the property relations of spouses whose marriage is declared void ab initio under Article 36?

Must a court withhold the decree of nullity of a marriage declared void under Article 36 until property partition is completed?

Under Article 147 of the Family Code, how are properties acquired by parties during cohabitation owned in a void marriage?

Choices available with full access.

What is the proper ruling on Dinah's motion for partial reconsideration questioning the entry restriction on the decree of nullity?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Article 50 Applicability
Under Article 50 of the Family Code, the requirement to liquidate, partition, and distribute properties before issuing a decree of nullity applies exclusively to marriages declared void under Article 40 or annulled under Article 45. The statutory purpose of Article 50 is to ensure proper settlement of the absolute community or conjugal partnership of gains and protection of children's presumptive legitimes. For marriages declared void ab initio under Article 36, property relations are governed by Article 147 co-ownership, making the procedural condition under Article 50 inapplicable.

2. Article 147 Co-Ownership
Under Article 147 of the Family Code, when a man and a woman who are capacitated to marry live together as husband and wife without a valid marriage, or under a void marriage under Article 36, their property relations are governed by the rules on co-ownership. Properties acquired by either or both parties through their joint work or industry are owned by them in equal shares. Unlike absolute community or conjugal partnership regimes, co-ownership under Article 147 does not require judicial liquidation and partition as a condition precedent to issuing the decree of nullity.

3. Decree Issuance Rules
In actions for declaration of absolute nullity of marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code, the court cannot withhold the issuance of the decree of absolute nullity pending property partition. Under Supreme Court administrative guidelines and prevailing jurisprudence, the decree of nullity must be issued upon finality of the decision declaring the marriage void ab initio. Property issues under Article 147 may be settled in a separate proceeding or subsequent partition suit without delaying the entry and issuance of the decree of nullity.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026