In her interview before the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC),Commissioner Annie Amorsolo of the National Labor Relations Commission claims that she should be given credit for judicial service because as NLRC Commissioner, she has the rank of a Justice of the Court of Appeals; she adjudicates cases that are appealable to the Court of Appeals; she is assigned car plate No. 10; and she is, by law, entitled to the rank, benefits and privileges of a Court of Appeals Justice.
If you are a member of the JBC, would you give credit to this explanation? (6%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, I would not give credit to Commissioner Amorsolo's explanation. Under Noblejas v. Teehankee and Re: Letter of CA Justice Veloso, a statutory grant conferring the rank and privileges of a magistrate upon an executive official
Unlock the full Political Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Noblejas v. Teehankee, does a statutory grant conferring the rank of a Court of Appeals Justice turn an executive official into a member of the Judiciary?
Equating statutory rank and privileges does not convert an executive position into a judicial office.
What is the legal nature of the functions performed by Commissioners of the National Labor Relations Commission?
NLRC Commissioners exercise quasi-judicial power as administrative officials under the Executive Department.
Why is service as an NLRC Commissioner not creditable as judicial service for judicial appointments?
Executive service, even when involving quasi-judicial adjudication, cannot be credited as judicial service.
How does the doctrine of separation of powers affect statutory grants of judicial rank to executive officials?
Choices available with full access.
What is the legal effect of assigning official car plate No. 10 to an NLRC Commissioner?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Judicial Service Credit
Under Noblejas v. Teehankee and Re: Letter of CA Justice Veloso, a statutory provision granting an executive official the rank, salary, and privileges of a member of the Judiciary does not convert executive or quasi-judicial service into actual judicial service. The Judiciary is a distinct branch of government under the principle of separation of powers. Executive officials performing quasi-judicial functions do not belong to the Judiciary. Consequently, statutory parity in compensation and benefits cannot be credited as judicial service for constitutional or statutory qualification requirements.
2. Quasi-Judicial Power Scope
The National Labor Relations Commission is an administrative agency attached to the Executive Department that exercises quasi-judicial functions. Although NLRC Commissioners adjudicate labor disputes and their decisions are appealable to the Court of Appeals, they remain executive officials rather than judicial officers. Resolving administrative controversies does not make an administrative body a court of law. Because quasi-judicial functions are administrative in character, service rendered in an executive commission does not constitute service in the Judiciary.
3. Separation of Powers
The doctrine of separation of powers prevents the legislature from creating judicial offices outside the constitutional Judiciary. Congress cannot constitutionally confer judicial status on executive officers simply by granting them ranks or privileges equal to appellate justices. Granting judicial car plates or protocol ranks to administrative officials is a matter of administrative classification and statutory privilege, which does not alter their executive character or endow them with judicial tenure and service credentials.