Gabby won as Senator in the May 2022 elections for a term of six years. Upon proclamation, Gabby took his oath of office before the Senate President in open session and assumed office at the start of his term. In August 2022, Senator Gabby resigned for personal reasons. In January 2023, Congress enacted a law merging two existing government agencies with a Presidential appointee as head of office. In August 2024, the President appointed former Senator Gabby as head of the merged government agencies. Is former Senator Gabby’s appointment as head of the merged government agencies valid? Explain.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, former Senator Gabby's appointment as head of the merged government agencies is not valid. Under Section 13, Article VI of the Constitution, no Senator or Representative may be appointed to any office created
Unlock the full Political Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Is former Senator Gabby's appointment as head of the merged government agencies valid?
Appointment to an office created during a legislator's elected term violates the forbidden office clause under Article VI, Section 13, regardless of resignation.
Under Article VI, Section 13 of the 1987 Constitution, what constitutes a forbidden office for a Member of Congress?
A forbidden office is any office created or whose emoluments were increased during the term for which a legislator was elected.
How does a legislator's voluntary resignation affect the constitutional prohibition against appointment to a forbidden office?
Resignation or voluntary renunciation does not shorten the constitutional ban, which lasts for the entire duration of the elected term.
What primary constitutional purpose underlies the prohibition against forbidden offices under Section 13, Article VI?
Choices available with full access.
How does a forbidden office differ from an incompatible office under Section 13, Article VI of the Constitution?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Forbidden Office Prohibition
Under Article VI, Section 13 of the 1987 Constitution, no Senator or Member of the House of Representatives may be appointed to any civil office created, or the emoluments whereof were increased, during the term for which they were elected. This constitutional prohibition creates an absolute disqualification designed to prevent legislators from enacting laws that create lucrative public offices or enhance existing civil positions for their own personal benefit or future presidential appointment.
2. Effect of Resignation
Voluntary renunciation of office, such as resignation, does not shorten or terminate the duration of the constitutional prohibition on forbidden offices. The term for which a Senator or Representative was elected remains six years or three years, respectively, regardless of early resignation. Consequently, a legislator who resigns during their term remains constitutionally disqualified from being appointed to any office created during that original elected term until its full expiration.
3. Incompatible Office Distinction
Constitutional law distinguishes a forbidden office from an incompatible office under Article VI, Section 13. An incompatible office prohibits a sitting legislator from holding any other government office during their tenure unless they forfeit their seat. In contrast, a forbidden office imposes a strict ban on appointment to any office created or augmented during the legislator's elected term, an absolute prohibition that persists even if the legislator ceases to hold legislative office.