Lao vs. Lao Digest (Oct. 2008)

Post updated on: [last-modified]



Lao vs. Lao, G.R. No. 170585, October 6, 2008

Facts

Petitioners David Lao et al filed with the SEC against respondent Dionision Lao, president of Pacific Foundry Shop Corp (PFSC) praying that the former be declared as stockholders and directors of PFSC. Petitioners claimed that they are stockholders based on GIS filed with the SEC, and Respondent Lao is estopped from contesting the GIS. However, petitioners Lao have no certificates of shares in their name.

Issue

Whether mere inclusion of petitioners in the GIS of a corp constitutes as a sufficient proof that they are shareholders of the company.

Ruling

No. GIS is an insufficient proof. A CoS is the evidence of a holder’s interest and status in the corporation. It is prima facie evidence that the holder is a shareholder of a corporation.  Other evidence: AOI, STB, Minutes of Meeting, Sec. Certficate


The content provided on this blog is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While the author is a lawyer, reading this blog, leaving a comment, or contacting the author through this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Any information you share here is not protected by attorney-client privilege. If you require legal advice regarding your specific set of facts or circumstances, please seek a lawyer consultation.
en_USEnglish
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x