Marvin, together with Calvin, planned a heist at an electric car store. Marvin and Calvin attempted to forcefully enter the store but the security guard, Gomez, barred them from entering. Thus, Calvin shot Gomez on the chest, who died on the spot. Marvin and Calvin then entered the store and demanded the store clerk, Gina, to give them the key to the electric car on display. Gina hesitantly gave the key. Despite complying, Marvin still shot Gina in the head, which led to her immediate demise. Upon getting the key and starting the electric car, Marvin drove it, while Calvin escaped on foot. After one day, Marvin became paranoid that Calvin might confess to the police about the crime they had just committed. Thus, Marvin shot Calvin in the chest, which led to the latter’s death. What crime/s did Marvin commit, if any? Explain.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Marvin committed two separate crimes: Qualified Carnapping under Republic Act No. 10883 and Murder under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code. Under R.A. No. 10883, taking a motor vehicle with intent to gain by violence or intimidation where any person is killed
Unlock the full Criminal Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Why are the killings of security guard Gomez and store clerk Gina absorbed into the crime of Qualified Carnapping under Republic Act No. 10883?
Under Republic Act No. 10883, when a person is killed on the occasion or by reason of carnapping, the killing and taking are absorbed into a single composite crime of qualified carnapping.
Why is Marvin's killing of Calvin considered a separate crime of Murder rather than part of the Qualified Carnapping?
A killing committed long after the carnapping is consummated and without direct connection to the original felony constitutes a separate crime of murder when executed with evident premeditation.
What qualifying circumstance elevates Marvin's act of shooting Calvin a day later to Murder under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code?
Marvin's deliberate planning overnight to shoot Calvin to prevent him from confessing satisfies the element of evident premeditation under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code.
What crimes should Marvin be criminally charged with for his overall acts?
Choices available with full access.
Under Republic Act No. 10883, what specific circumstance qualifies the crime of carnapping?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Carnapping
Under Republic Act No. 10883, carnapping is the taking of a motor vehicle with intent to gain by means of violence or intimidation. When the owner, driver, or any occupant is killed in the course or on the occasion of the carnapping, the offense becomes qualified carnapping. The law treats the unlawful taking and the accompanying killing as a single, indivisible composite crime. Consequently, shooting security personnel or store employees during the taking of a vehicle constitutes qualified carnapping rather than separate property and personal crimes.
2. Murder
Under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, a killing constitutes murder when attended by qualifying circumstances such as evident premeditation. Evident premeditation requires proof of the time when the offender determined to commit the crime, an overt act indicating adherence to that determination, and a lapse of time allowing cool thought and reflection upon the consequences. When an offender plans and executes a killing after a substantial interval—such as shooting a co-conspirator a day later out of paranoia—the deliberate reflection satisfies evident premeditation, elevating the killing to murder.
3. Subsequent Separate Felony
Under Philippine criminal law, a subsequent criminal act committed after the consummation of an initial felony constitutes a distinct, separate crime if it lacks a direct causal connection to the original offense. While killings committed during or on the occasion of an unlawful taking form part of a composite felony, a killing executed long after as an independent afterthought is not absorbed. When an offender kills an accomplice a day later to prevent a police confession, the subsequent killing is treated as a separate crime of murder requiring independent prosecution.