On his graduation day from senior high, Joshua, who was 16 years old, received a brand-new car as a gift from his parents. After a month, Joshua sold the car to Matthew, his best friend and classmate who was also 16 years old, with a 30% discount because the car had already been used for a month. When Joshua’s father found out about the sale, he sued Matthew to recover the car, claiming that the sale is void because both the buyer and seller are minors and have no capacity to contract without their parents’ consent. By way of compromise, Joshua’s father offered to return the money paid by Matthew under the condition that Matthew should return the car in good condition. Is the sale valid? Explain.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, the sale is not valid. Under Article 1403(3) of the Civil Code, a contract where both contracting parties are incapable of giving consent, such as when both are unemancipated minors, is unenforceable. Under Article 1407, express or implied ratification by
Unlock the full Civil Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What is the legal status of a contract where both contracting parties are unemancipated minors incapable of giving consent?
Under Article 1403(3) of the Civil Code, contracts where both contracting parties are incapable of giving consent, such as unemancipated minors, are unenforceable.
Under Article 1407 of the Civil Code, what is the legal effect if the parent or guardian of only one of the minor parties ratifies an unenforceable contract?
Under Article 1407 of the Civil Code, express or implied ratification by the parent or guardian of one of the incapacitated parties transforms the contract from unenforceable to voidable.
What is required under Article 1407 of the Civil Code to fully validate an unenforceable contract entered into by two minors from its inception?
Pursuant to Article 1407 of the Civil Code, if ratification is made by the parents or guardians of both contracting parties, the contract shall be cleansed of its defect and validated from its inception.
How does a contract where only one party is a minor differ from a contract where both parties are minors under the Civil Code?
Choices available with full access.
In the case of an unratified sales contract between two minors, what remedy is available to a minor's parent seeking to recover property transferred under the agreement?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Unenforceable Contracts
Under Article 1403(3) of the Civil Code, a contract is unenforceable when both contracting parties are legally incapacitated from giving consent, such as when both are unemancipated minors. This differs from a voidable contract under Article 1390(1), which arises when only one party lacks legal capacity. Unenforceable contracts occupy an intermediate status between voidable and void contracts, as they possess the essential elements of a contract but cannot be enforced through court action without proper ratification.
2. Ratification
Under Article 1407 of the Civil Code, an unenforceable contract entered into by two incapacitated parties may be cured through ratification by their parents or guardians. If the parent or guardian of only one party ratifies the transaction, the contract becomes merely voidable, remaining valid until annulled by the other party's representative. However, if the parents or guardians of both contracting parties ratify the agreement, the contract is cleansed of its defect and validated from its inception.
3. Voidable Versus Void
Unlike void contracts which are absolute nullities and cannot be ratified, unenforceable contracts are validable agreements that can produce full legal effect upon proper ratification. When a contract between minors remains unratified and unenforceable, court action may be brought to recover property transferred under the transaction. Upon recovery, equity and civil law principles require the restoration of what was given, including the return of the purchase price to restore the parties to their prior position.