ABC Corporation, a legitimate job contractor engaged in the construction business, hired X as a plumber. Under a service agreement, ABC Corporation undertook to provide workers for the construction project of XYZ Corporation, a company engaged in real estate development. X was among those assigned by ABC Corporation to the project. While the construction project was ongoing, X filed a complaint for underpayment of wages against both ABC Corporation and XYZ Corporation. XYZ Corporation denied liability, claiming that ABC Corporation, as the true employer of X, should be solely liable for the underpayment of wages of X. Is XYZ Corporation correct? Reason(s).
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, XYZ Corporation is not correct. It is solidarily liable with ABC Corporation for the underpayment of X's wages. Under Articles 106 and 109 of the Labor Code, whenever a principal contracts with a
Unlock the full Labor Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Articles 106 and 107 of the Labor Code, what is the legal status of a principal that contracts with a legitimate job contractor?
A principal that contracts with a legitimate job contractor becomes an indirect employer liable for unpaid wages and labor standard violations.
What is the nature of the principal's liability alongside a legitimate job contractor for unpaid wages of contracted workers?
Articles 106 and 109 establish that the principal and contractor are solidarily liable for labor standard violations and unpaid wages.
Why was XYZ Corporation's defense of sole liability against ABC Corporation rejected in the wage underpayment complaint?
XYZ Corporation's defense fails because Articles 106 and 109 impose solidary liability on the principal as an indirect employer.
To what extent is a principal solidarily liable for unpaid wages incurred by a legitimate job contractor?
Choices available with full access.
What legal remedy does a principal possess after paying underpaid wages owed by a legitimate job contractor to its workers?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Indirect Employer Liability
Under Article 107 of the Labor Code, a person, partnership, or corporation that contracts with an independent contractor for the performance of any work, task, or project becomes an indirect employer of the contractor's employees. The law creates an indirect employment relationship solely to guarantee the payment of wages and statutory benefits. Even if the principal exercises no control over the direct contractor's employees, the statutory classification as an indirect employer binds the principal to fulfill labor standard obligations for work executed for its benefit during the contract period.
2. Solidary Wage Liability
Under Articles 106 and 109 of the Labor Code, a principal is jointly and severally liable with its legitimate job contractor for any violation of labor standards, including underpayment of wages and non-payment of statutory benefits. This statutory solidary liability ensures that workers are fully protected and paid for services rendered. The principal's liability is direct and primary regarding unpaid wages earned during the project, although the principal retains the legal right to seek reimbursement or indemnification from the contractor under their private service agreement.
3. Legitimate Job Contracting
Legitimate job contracting refers to an arrangement where a contractor carries on an independent business, possesses substantial capital or investment in tools and equipment, and performs work free from the principal's control except as to the result. Unlike labor-only contracting, legitimate job contracting does not create an direct employer-employee relationship between the principal and the contractor's workers. However, legitimacy does not exempt the principal from statutory solidary liability for wage violations incurred by the contractor in the performance of the contract.