2024 Civil Law, Q15

Ginny arrived at Star Viva Hotel (SVH) and entrusted the ignition key of her vehicle to parking attendant Marco, who in turn, issued a valet parking customer claim stub. After parking the vehicle, Marco placed the ignition key inside a safety box. Ginny proceeded to the hotel lobby to check in. At midnight, the hotel security officer informed Ginny that her vehicle was carnapped. Ginny filed against SVH an action for damages for the loss of the vehicle. In its answer, SVH denied responsibility for any loss or damage to vehicles in the parking area since the valet parking service is a special privilege given for the convenience of hotel guests. Is SVH liable for the loss of Ginny’s vehicle? Explain.

Quick check

Under Article 1998 of the Civil Code, what is the legal nature of a guest's vehicle placed in a hotel's parking facility?

When does the statutory liability of a hotelkeeper as a depositary over a guest's vehicle commence?

Under Article 2001 of the Civil Code, when does theft or carnapping excuse a hotelkeeper from liability for lost guest property?

What is the legal effect of a hotel disclaimer notice stating that management is not responsible for lost vehicles in its parking area?

Choices available with full access.

Why was Star Viva Hotel held liable for the carnapping of Ginny's vehicle?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Necessary Deposit Concept
Under Article 1998 in relation to Article 1962 of the Civil Code, the deposit of effects made by travelers in hotels or inns is regarded as a necessary deposit. This statutory deposit extends to vehicles and motor conveyances introduced by hotel guests into hotel parking facilities or annexes assigned for that purpose. The liability of the hotelkeeper as a depositary commences as soon as notice is given to the hotel management or its authorized employees, such as valet parking attendants, who receive custody of the vehicle and its keys.

2. Hotelkeeper Liability Scope
Under Article 1999 and Article 2000 of the Civil Code, hotelkeepers are held strictly liable as depositaries for any loss of, or injury to, personal property brought by guests into the hotel premises. This statutory liability encompasses vehicles entrusted to hotel employees through valet parking services. The hotel management cannot escape responsibility by claiming that valet parking is a mere voluntary accommodation or courtesy extended to guests. The hotelkeeper remains accountable for maintaining adequate security and supervision over vehicles placed within its custody.

3. Exemption from Liability
Under Article 2001 of the Civil Code, the act of a thief or carnapper does not constitute force majeure or a fortuitous event exempting the hotelkeeper from liability, unless the crime is committed with arms or through irresistible force. Furthermore, under Article 2003, any stipulation or notice posted by the hotelkeeper suppressing or diminishing its statutory liability for the loss of guest property is void. Unless the loss results from armed robbery or guest negligence, the hotelkeeper remains fully answerable for the stolen vehicle.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026