China Telecommunication Company (CTC), a Chinese state-owned enterprise, sought to acquire 40% equity in Duon Telecommunication Corporation (DTC), a telecommunications company in the Philippines. When questioned by the two major telecommunication companies in the Philippines, Cheng, the president of DTC, defended the proposed acquisition by saying that CTC is allowed to own 40% equity pursuant to the nationality requirement under the 1987 Constitution. Is the argument of Cheng correct? Discuss your answer.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, Cheng's argument is incorrect. Under Section 24 of the Public Service Act (C.A. No. 146), as amended by R.A. No. 11659, foreign state-owned enterprises or entities controlled by a foreign government are prohibited from owning
Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Republic Act Number 11659, how is telecommunications classified in Philippine public service law?
Republic Act Number 11659 explicitly classifies telecommunications as critical infrastructure.
What is the statutory restriction on foreign state-owned enterprises regarding critical infrastructure capital?
Section 24 of Republic Act Number 11659 prohibits foreign state-owned enterprises from owning capital in critical infrastructure.
Does the forty percent foreign equity limit under the Constitution permit a foreign state-owned company to invest in telecommunications?
Foreign state-owned enterprises are prohibited from owning capital in critical infrastructure regardless of general equity limits.
Which law amended Commonwealth Act Number 146 regarding public services and critical infrastructure?
Choices available with full access.
What is the underlying policy behind prohibiting foreign state-owned enterprises from owning telecommunication entities?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Critical Infrastructure Classification
Under Section 2(e) of the Public Service Act (Commonwealth Act Number 146), as amended by Republic Act Number 11659, telecommunications is explicitly defined and classified as critical infrastructure. Critical infrastructure refers to public service systems or assets so vital to the Philippines that their incapacity or destruction would have a debilitating impact on national security, economic security, or public health and safety. Consequently, telecommunications entities operating within the national territory are subject to heightened statutory security restrictions and ownership limitations governing critical national assets.
2. Foreign State Enterprise
Under Section 24 of Republic Act Number 11659, foreign state-owned enterprises or sovereign entities acting on behalf of a foreign government are strictly prohibited from owning capital or equity in any public service entity classified as a public utility or critical infrastructure. This statutory prohibition applies regardless of whether the proposed foreign equity ownership falls within the general constitutional forty percent ceiling. The prohibition safeguards vital national communication networks and critical infrastructure from direct control, influence, or ownership by foreign sovereign states.
3. Public Service Amendments
Republic Act Number 11659 amended the Public Service Act by distinguishing public utilities from other public services and critical infrastructure. While the amendment relaxed foreign equity restrictions for certain public services, it simultaneously introduced robust national security safeguards over critical infrastructure. Foreign state-owned corporations are completely barred from holding capital in critical infrastructure enterprises like telecommunications, overriding general rules on foreign investment participation to protect national sovereignty and national security interest.