2022 Civil Law, Q4

The spouses Santos are the registered owners of Lot 2 located in Umaga Subdivision, Caramoan, Camarines Sur, covered by TCT No. 1369. Lot 2, which has been occupied by the spouses Santos for about 11 years, has a one-storey residential house which was already erected thereon when Lot 2 was purchased by them from the spouses Cruz in 2005. At the time of the acquisition of Lot 2, the adjoining lot, Lot 1, which was also owned by the spouses Cruz, was an idle land without any improvements. Lot 1 remained empty until the spouses Cruz started the construction of a two-storey residential house thereon in 2018. The house constructed on Lot 1 being taller than the spouses Santos’ one-storey residential house, the spouses Cruz’s two-storey residential house obstructed the light, air, and view of the spouses Santos’ residential house. The spouses Santos bemoaned how, prior to the construction on Lot 1, they received enough bright and natural light from their windows. The construction rendered their house dark such that they are unable to do their normal activities in their house without switching on their lights. Have the spouses Santos acquired an easement of light and view with respect to Lot 1 owned by the spouses Cruz? Explain briefly. (5 points)

Quick check

Under Article 624 of the Civil Code, what creates a title for an easement of light and view upon the division of ownership of two properties?

What exception prevents the creation of an easement of light and view under Article 624 of the Civil Code?

How does Article 624 of the Civil Code differ from acquisition of light and view under Article 638?

What is the legal status of windows constructed on a house by the common owner of two adjoining lots upon the sale of the house lot?

Why did the spouses Santos acquire an easement of light and view over Lot 1 owned by the spouses Cruz?

Learn more about these topics

1. Apparent Sign Easement
Under Article 624 of the Civil Code, the existence of an apparent sign of an easement established or maintained by the common owner of two properties constitutes a title for the easement to continue actively and passively. This rule applies when either property is alienated, unless at the time the ownership is divided, the contrary is provided in the title of conveyance, or the apparent sign is removed before the execution of the deed.

2. Title Creation Mode
Easements may be acquired either by virtue of a title or by prescription. Under Article 624, the easement of light and view is created by title by operation of law upon the severance of ownership of the two estates. When the common owner alienates the property possessing windows without removing them or stipulating against the easement, the burden on the adjoining lot arises automatically upon execution of the conveyance.

3. Garcia Santos Doctrine
Under the landmark ruling in Garcia v. Santos, the statutory requirement of a formal prohibition under Article 638 applies only when windows are opened on one's own wall on a single property without prior common ownership. When windows already exist on a building erected by a common owner who later sells the property, Article 624 applies, and an easement of light and view is created immediately upon sale without requiring a formal prohibition.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026