Is the printout of a photograph from your mobile phone showing a fly in the soup you ordered as admissible evidence in an action for damages against the restaurant owner? Explain briefly.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Yes, the printout of the photograph from the mobile phone is admissible in evidence. Under Section 4(a), Rule 130 of the Rules of Court, if data is stored in a computer or similar device, any printout readable by sight, shown
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What classification is given under Rule 130 to a printout of data stored in a computer or mobile phone that accurately reflects the stored data?
Section 4(a), Rule 130 considers a printout reflecting stored computer data accurately as an original document.
Under the Rules on Electronic Evidence, how is a digital photograph stored in a mobile phone properly authenticated in court?
A digital photo is authenticated by a witness who can verify that it accurately depicts the scene.
Does a mobile phone qualify as a device similar to a computer under Section 4(a), Rule 130 of the Rules of Court?
A mobile phone stores digital data capable of producing visual printouts, qualifying as a device similar to a computer.
What rule governs the admissibility of electronic documents and digital photographic evidence in Philippine courts?
Choices available with full access.
In an action for damages against a restaurant owner, what is required for a photograph of contaminated food to be admitted?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Original Document Rule
Under Section 4(a), Rule 130 of the Revised Rules on Evidence, when data is stored in a computer or similar electronic device, any printout or output readable by sight that is shown to reflect the data accurately is treated as an original document. A smartphone or mobile camera functions as a device similar to a computer under the rules. Consequently, printing a digital photograph stored on a mobile phone creates a duplicate or original printout that satisfies the original document rule for evidentiary purposes in civil actions.
2. Electronic Evidence Rules
Under the Rules on Electronic Evidence (A.M. No. 01-7-01-SC), digital photographs and electronic documents are admissible in evidence provided they are properly authenticated. Authentication requires showing that the photograph accurately reflects the scene or object depicted and presenting testimony from the person who took the picture or any competent witness with personal knowledge. Once authenticated, electronic photographs possess full probative value to establish material facts, such as the presence of foreign objects in food in tort or breach of contract suits.
3. Authentication of Photographs
To establish the admissibility of a printed photograph in court, the offering party must present a competent witness to testify to its fidelity and accuracy. The witness need not be a expert technician or professional photographer; any person present when the photograph was taken who can verify that it faithfully portrays the subject matter can authenticate it. Proper authentication transforms the printed photograph into competent visual evidence, enabling the trial court to assess damages and establish liability against a negligent restaurant proprietor.