On her deathbed, your grandmother revealed to you that in 1994, she and her family won a civil action for damages against a former President for human rights atrocities committed against them during martial law. The judgment was never appealed. Your grandmother informed you that she never had the judgment executed because she wanted this to be her parting gift for you when she passed. She said that she also felt the need to wait for one of her grandchildren to become a lawyer. It so happened that you have just passed the #BestBarEver2020_21. Your grandmother spent her last moments narrating how she had been arrested by the military during martial law, and was then tortured and raped while under detention. She emphasized that her case was not unique, and that until now, she was yet to receive an apology from any member of the former President’s family. With her last breath, she instructed you not to let her experience happen again. Her parting words to you were: “Never again!” Is an action for revival of judgment the proper remedy to enable the judgment’s execution? Explain briefly.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, an action for revival of judgment is not the proper remedy to enable the judgment's execution. Under Section 6, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and Article 1144 of the Civil Code,
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Within what period may a final judgment be executed by mere motion under Section 6, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court?
A final judgment may be executed by mere motion within five years from the date of its entry.
What is the proper remedy to enforce a final judgment after five years but before ten years from its entry?
An independent action for revival of judgment is the proper remedy after five years but within ten years from entry.
Under Article 1144 of the Civil Code, what is the prescriptive period for filing an action upon a judgment?
Article 1144 of the Civil Code establishes a ten-year prescriptive period for an action upon a judgment.
What is the legal effect if a judgment creditor fails to enforce or revive a civil judgment within ten years from entry?
Choices available with full access.
Can equity or tragic personal circumstances override the statutory ten-year prescriptive period for reviving a judgment?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Execution of Judgment
Under Section 6, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, a final and executory judgment may be executed on motion within five years from the date of its entry. After the lapse of five years, but before it is barred by the statute of limitations, a judgment may be enforced by an independent action for revival. Executing a judgment within these reglementary periods is mandatory to ensure the stability of judicial decisions and prevent stale litigation. Failure to seek execution within the prescribed time limits deprives the victorious party of court-assisted enforcement mechanisms.
2. Prescription of Action
An action for revival of judgment under Rule 39 must be brought within ten years from the date the judgment becomes final and executory, pursuant to Article 1144 of the Civil Code. Once the ten-year prescriptive period elapses without any action for revival being instituted in court, the right to enforce the judgment is completely extinguished by prescription. Laches and prescription bar stale claims regardless of the moral strength or tragic background of the underlying cause, as statutes of limitation apply strictly to all civil judgments.
3. Remedy After Prescription
When a judgment has prescribed after ten years from entry, neither a motion for execution nor an independent action for revival can prosper. Courts cannot extend or waive prescriptive periods set by law based solely on equity, personal hardship, or moral considerations. Consequently, a judgment creditor who sleeps on their rights for over two decades loses all procedural remedies for judicial enforcement. The only remaining recourse for the judgment creditor or their heirs would be voluntary compliance or extrajudicial settlement by the judgment debtor.