2019 Remedial Law, Q13

In a neighborhood bicycle race, Mr. A bumped the bicycle of one of his competitors, Mr. B, in order to get ahead. This caused the latter to lose control of the bike which hit the concrete pavement and sent Mr. B crashing headfirst into the sidewalk. By the time the organizers got to him, Mr. B was dead. Law enforcement authorities who witnessed the incident arrested Mr. A without a warrant, and immediately brought him to the inquest prosecutor for the conduct of an inquest. Thereafter, an Information for Homicide was filed by the inquest prosecutor without the conduct of a preliminary investigation. The next day Mr. A requested for the conduct of a preliminary investigation.
(a) Is the inquest prosecutor’s filing of the Information without the conduct of preliminary investigation proper? (2.5%)
(b) Is Mr. A’s request permissible? Explain. (2.5%)

Quick check

Under Section 6, Rule 112 of the Rules of Court, when may a criminal Information be filed without a preliminary investigation?

Within what period after learning of the filing of an Information may an accused request a preliminary investigation?

Is the accused required to sign a waiver of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code when requesting a preliminary investigation after the Information is filed?

What is the primary purpose of an inquest proceeding conducted by a prosecutor?

Choices available with full access.

Which type of warrantless arrest occurs when the suspect commits an offense in the physical presence of the arresting officer?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Remedial Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Inquest Proceedings Scope
Under Section 6, Rule 112 of the Rules of Court, an Information may be filed in court without a prior preliminary investigation when a person is lawfully arrested without a warrant. In such cases, an inquest investigation is conducted by the inquest prosecutor to determine whether the warrantless arrest was valid and if probable cause exists to hold the detained person for trial. The inquest proceeding serves as a summary inquiry that substitutes for a full preliminary investigation, allowing the government to promptly file criminal charges while maintaining the lawful detention of the arrested person.

2. Warrantless Arrest Rules
Section 5, Rule 113 of the Rules of Court authorizes a peace officer or private person to make a warrantless arrest under specific conditions, such as when an offense has just been committed in their presence. When an arrest is executed under valid in flagrante delicto or hot pursuit circumstances, the arresting officers are required by law to deliver the detained individual directly to the nearest police station and inquest prosecutor. A valid warrantless arrest is a prerequisite for bypassing regular preliminary investigation proceedings prior to filing a criminal Information.

3. Post-Filing Investigation Right
Even after an Information has been filed following an inquest proceeding, the accused retains the statutory right to request a full preliminary investigation. Under Rule 112, Section 6, the accused may move for a preliminary investigation before the trial court within five days from learning of the filing of the Information. Asking for a preliminary investigation within this reglementary period does not require the accused to sign a waiver of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, ensuring procedural due process and an opportunity to submit counter-affidavits.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026