2019 Mercantile Law, Q3

In June 2018, DEF Corp. sent notices to its stockholders informing them of the corporation’s issuance of new shares of stock. The notice included a reminder that, pursuant to DEF Corp.’ s Articles of Incorporation, any stockholder who fails to exercise his or her pre-emptive right within three (3) weeks from receipt of notice would be considered to have waived the same.
Ms. Z, a stockholder of DEF Corp., failed to exercise her pre-emptive right within the said period. However, she claimed that she did not validly waive her right to do so because a waiver must be expressed in writing.
(a) Explain the concept of pre-emptive right under the Corporation Code. (2 %)
(b) Is Ms. Z’s contention correct? Explain. (3%)

Quick check

Under Section 38 of the Revised Corporation Code, what is the primary purpose of a stockholder's pre-emptive right?

Is a formal written waiver required for a stockholder to validly waive a pre-emptive right?

Under what condition may pre-emptive rights be completely denied to stockholders of a corporation?

Why is Ms. Z's claim that her waiver of pre-emptive rights had to be expressed in writing legally incorrect?

Which statute governs pre-emptive rights and corporate share dispositions in Philippine stock corporations?

Learn more about these topics

1. Pre-Emptive Right Concept
Under Section 38 of the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (Republic Act Number 11232), all stockholders of a stock corporation enjoy a pre-emptive right to subscribe to all issues or dispositions of shares of any class, in proportion to their respective shareholdings. The legal purpose of pre-emptive right is to protect existing stockholders against equity dilution, preserving both their proportionate voting power and financial interest in the corporation. Unless restricted or denied by the articles of incorporation, pre-emptive rights apply to capital increases and unissued stock disposition.

2. Waiver of Rights
Under Section 38 of Republic Act Number 11232 and civil law principles governing rights, pre-emptive rights are personal to the stockholder and may be validly waived either expressly or impliedly. While an express waiver is stated explicitly, an implied waiver occurs when a stockholder, after receiving due notice, fails or neglects to exercise the pre-emptive right within the reasonable period prescribed by the corporate bylaws or articles of incorporation. A formal written instrument is not statutorily mandated to effectuate a valid waiver of pre-emptive rights.

3. Articles of Incorporation
The articles of incorporation constitute the fundamental charter defining corporate powers and shareholder privileges. Provisions in the articles of incorporation denying or regulating pre-emptive rights bind all stockholders. When the articles specify that a failure to exercise pre-emptive rights within a designated timeframe constitutes a waiver, shareholders who fail to act within that period impliedly surrender their preferential subscription privilege. Corporate officers are entitled to rely on such charter provisions to issue unissued or increased shares to other subscribers without incurring corporate liability.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026