2019 Mercantile Law, Q11

W Medical, Inc. operated a full-service hospital named WMed. Using its stockholders’ advances and a mortgage loan from Bank X, W Medical, Inc. commenced the construction of a new 11-storey WMed Annex Building. Unfortunately, due to financial constraints, only seven (7) floors were constructed and the WMed Annex Building remained unfinished.
Despite the non-completion of the WMed Annex Building, W Medical, Inc. continued its operations and earned modest revenues. While W Medical, Inc.’s assets are more than its liabilities and it is able to turn a monthly profit, it could not pay its loan installments to Bank X as they fall due.
(a) What is the concept of “insolvency” under the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act (FRIA)? May W Medical, Inc. be considered “insolvent” under the FRIA? Explain. (3%)
(b) Assuming that W Medical, Inc. is considered “insolvent”, may it file a petition for suspension of payments under the FRIA? Explain. (2%)
(c) Assuming that W Medical, Inc. is considered “insolvent”, what are the legally recognized modes of rehabilitation it may opt to avail of? (3%)
(d) If W Medical, Inc. files a petition for rehabilitation before the court, is it possible for the rehabilitation proceedings to be converted into one for liquidation? Explain. (2%)

Quick check

Under Section 4(p) of the FRIA (R.A. No. 10142), how is insolvency defined regarding corporate debtors?

Why is a corporate debtor ineligible to file a petition for suspension of payments under FRIA?

Which of the following are the three legally recognized modes of corporate rehabilitation under FRIA?

Under what condition may a pending corporate rehabilitation proceeding be converted into liquidation by the court?

Choices available with full access.

Which Philippine statute governs corporate rehabilitation, insolvency, and liquidation proceedings?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Concept of Insolvency
Under Section 4(p) of the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010 (Republic Act Number 10142), insolvency is broadly defined to encompass both financial illiquidity and absolute insolvency. A debtor is statutorily insolvent if it is generally unable to pay its or his liabilities as they fall due in the ordinary course of business, or if its liabilities exceed its assets. Consequently, even if a corporate enterprise possesses total assets exceeding its total liabilities and operates at a monthly profit, defaulting on matured loan installment obligations satisfies the statutory definition of relative insolvency under FRIA.

2. Corporate Rehabilitation Modes
Under Republic Act Number 10142, an insolvent corporate debtor seeking to restore financial viability may avail of three legally recognized modes of rehabilitation: court-supervised rehabilitation, pre-negotiated rehabilitation, and out-of-court or informal restructuring agreements. Court-supervised rehabilitation may be initiated through voluntary or involuntary petitions. Pre-negotiated rehabilitation requires prior approval by the debtor and creditors holding at least two-thirds of total liabilities. Out-of-court restructuring agreements require approval by creditors representing at least eighty-five percent of total claims, providing flexible avenues for corporate debt restructuring.

3. Conversion to Liquidation
Under Section 25(c) and related provisions of Republic Act Number 10142, court-supervised corporate rehabilitation proceedings may be converted into insolvency liquidation proceedings. If at any time during the proceedings the rehabilitation court determines that the debtor is insolvably insolvent or that there is no substantial likelihood for the debtor to be successfully rehabilitated, the court may issue an order converting the rehabilitation case into one for liquidation. Conversion ensures that remaining corporate assets are equitably distributed among secured and unsecured creditors when financial restoration proves legally or economically unfeasible.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026