2019 Labor Law and Social Legislation, Q14

Upon a review of the wage rate and structure pertaining to its regular rank and file employees, K Corporation found it necessary to increase its hiring rates for employees belonging to the different job classification levels to make their salary rates more competitive in the labor market.
After the implementation of the new hiring salary, Union X, the exclusive bargaining agent of the rank and file employees, demanded a similar salary adjustment for the old employees. It argued that the increase in hiring rates resulted in wage distortion since it erased the wage gap between the new and old employees. In other words, new employees would enjoy almost the same salary rates as K Corporation’s old employees.
(a) What is wage distortion? (2%)
(b) Did a wage distortion arise under the circumstances which legally obligated K Corporation to rectify the wages of its old employees? Explain. (3%)

Quick check

Under Article 124 of the Labor Code, what is a necessary element for a statutory wage distortion to exist?

According to the Bankard doctrine, does a voluntary increase in entry-level hiring rates trigger statutory wage distortion?

How must a statutory wage distortion dispute be resolved in an organized establishment with a union?

Why was K Corporation NOT legally obligated to rectify the salaries of its senior employees?

Choices available with full access.

What happens if a wage distortion dispute in an unorganized establishment cannot be settled by the parties?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Labor Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Wage Distortion Requisites
Under Article 124 of the Labor Code, wage distortion is a situation where an increase in prescribed wage rates results in the elimination or severe contraction of intentional quantitative differences in wage or salary rates between and among employee groups in an establishment. To establish a legally actionable wage distortion, four elements must concur: an existing hierarchy of positions with distinct salary rates, a significant wage adjustment, a severe contraction or erasure of the salary gap, and the wage increase being mandated by a law or Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board wage order.

2. Bankard Doctrine Rule
In the landmark case of Bankard Employees Union v. NLRC, the Supreme Court established that the statutory concept of wage distortion under Article 124 applies exclusively to wage adjustments resulting from a law or wage order issued by competent authority. Unilateral wage adjustments executed voluntarily by an employer as a management prerogative—such as raising entry-level hiring salaries to attract competitive talent in the market—do not trigger statutory wage distortion. An employer cannot be legally compelled to adjust the salaries of senior workers when wage compression stems purely from voluntary corporate pay scale revisions.

3. Wage Distortion Rectification
When a true wage distortion arises from a statutory wage order, Article 124 mandates a specific procedure for resolution and rectification. In organized establishments with a recognized bargaining agent, the employer and the union must negotiate to correct the distortion using the grievance machinery established in their Collective Bargaining Agreement. If the grievance remains unresolved, the dispute shall be submitted to voluntary arbitration. In unorganized establishments, employers and employees must endeavor to settle the distortion, and failing agreement, submit the dispute to the National Conciliation and Mediation Board for conciliation.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026