One Sunday afternoon, Mr. X, President of ABC Corp., happened to bump into the Labor Arbiter assigned to the illegal dismissal case filed by certain employees against his company. During their encounter, Mr. X promised the Labor Arbiter a luxury car in exchange for a favorable ruling. The Labor Arbiter immediately rejected the offer and walked away.
(a) What crime did Mr. X commit under the Revised Penal Code (RPC), if any? Explain. (2.5%)
(b) Assuming that Mr. X’s offer was instead accepted, should the Labor Arbiter be held liable for any crime under the RPC? If so, for what crime? May the Labor Arbiter also be held liable for violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act? Explain. (5%)
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
(a) Mr. X committed Attempted Corruption of Public Officials; (b) if accepted, the Labor Arbiter is liable for Direct Bribery and Section 3(e) of RA 3019. Under Article 212 of the RPC, offering a bribe is Attempted Corruption of Public
Unlock the full Criminal Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
What crime is committed by a private individual who offers a gift to a public officer if the offer is rejected?
Offering a gift to a public officer which is rejected constitutes Attempted Corruption of Public Officials under Article 212.
When does a public officer commit Direct Bribery under Article 210 of the Revised Penal Code?
Direct Bribery is committed when an officer accepts a gift or promise to perform or refrain from an official act.
Under Section 3(e) of RA 3019, what mental element or mode of commission establishes anti-graft liability?
Section 3(e) of RA 3019 penalizes giving unwarranted benefits through manifest partiality, evident bad faith, or gross negligence.
May a public officer be held liable under both the Revised Penal Code and RA 3019 for accepting a bribe?
Choices available with full access.
Is a Labor Arbiter considered a public officer within the coverage of penal laws on corruption and bribery?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Corruption of Officials
Under Article 212 of the Revised Penal Code, corruption of public officials is committed by any person who offers or promises a gift or present to a public officer under circumstances that would make the public officer liable for direct or indirect bribery. If the public officer rejects the offer or promise, the crime remains in the attempted stage as attempted corruption of public officials, penalizing the offender for attempting to corrupt judicial or administrative integrity.
2. Direct Bribery
Under Article 210 of the Revised Penal Code, direct bribery is committed by any public officer who agrees to perform an act constituting a crime, or an unjust or improper act, or refrain from doing an act pertaining to official duties, in consideration of any offer, promise, gift, or present. When a quasi-judicial officer accepts a luxury vehicle to render a favorable decision, he incurs criminal liability for direct bribery.
3. Anti-Graft Liability
Under Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, public officers are criminally liable for causing undue injury to any party or giving any private party unwarranted benefits through manifest partiality, evident bad faith, or gross inexcusable negligence. Accepting a bribe to favor a corporate litigant constitutes manifest partiality, subjecting the officer to concurrent prosecution under both the Revised Penal Code and special penal law.