2018 Taxation Law, Q14

The City of Kabankalan issued a notice of assessment against KKK, Inc. for deficiency real property taxes for the taxable years 2013 to 2017 in the amount of PhP 20 million. KKK paid the taxes under protest and instituted a complaint entitled “Recovery of Illegally and/or Erroneously-Collected Local Business Tax, Prohibition with Prayer to Issue TRO and Writ of Preliminary Injunction” with the RTC of Negros Occidental.
The RTC denied the application for TRO. Its motion for reconsideration having been denied as well, KKK filed a petition for certiorari with the Court of Appeals (CA) assailing the denial of the TRO.
Will the petition prosper? (5%)

Quick check

Which judicial body has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over local tax cases decided by Regional Trial Courts under Republic Act No. 9282?

Which tribunal has jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari assailing an interlocutory order of an RTC in a local tax case?

Why is the Court of Appeals devoid of jurisdiction to entertain a certiorari petition assailing the denial of a TRO in a local tax case?

What is the proper judicial remedy to challenge an RTC interlocutory order denying injunctive relief in a local tax assessment dispute?

Choices available with full access.

What is the legal effect if a corporate taxpayer files a petition for certiorari with the Court of Appeals in a local tax case?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. CTA Appellate Jurisdiction
Under Republic Act No. 9282, the Court of Tax Appeals possesses exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review on appeal decisions, orders, or resolutions of Regional Trial Courts in local tax cases originally decided or resolved by them in the exercise of their original or appellate jurisdiction. Local tax cases encompass disputes involving deficiency real property tax assessments and local business tax refund claims. When a local tax controversy is pending before a Regional Trial Court, statutory appellate oversight is vested exclusively in the Court of Tax Appeals to ensure uniform judicial resolution of local tax issues.

2. Interlocutory Certiorari Jurisdiction
The Court of Tax Appeals' exclusive appellate jurisdiction over local tax cases carries with it the implied and inherent power to issue special civil writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus. Consequently, petitions for certiorari assailing interlocutory orders issued by a Regional Trial Court in local tax litigation, such as the denial of a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, must be filed exclusively with the Court of Tax Appeals. This authority prevents split judicial jurisdiction and maintains supervisory authority within a specialized tax tribunal.

3. CA Jurisdiction Deficit
The Court of Appeals is completely devoid of jurisdiction to entertain petitions for certiorari assailing interlocutory orders issued by Regional Trial Courts in local tax cases. Republic Act No. 9282 transferred full appellate and certiorari authority over local tax matters from the Court of Appeals to the Court of Tax Appeals. Any petition for certiorari incorrectly filed before the Court of Appeals seeking to enjoin or set aside an interlocutory ruling of a trial court in a local tax dispute must be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026