2017 Remedial Law, Q3

Answer the following briefly:
(a) What elements should concur for circumstantial evidence to be sufficient for conviction? (2%)
(b) When is bail a matter of judicial discretion? (2%)
(c) Give at least two instances when a peace officer or a private person may make a valid warrantless arrest. (2%)
(d) What is a tender of excluded evidence? (2%)

Quick check

What is required for circumstantial evidence to be sufficient for conviction in a criminal case?

When is bail a matter of judicial discretion prior to conviction?

Which of the following constitutes a valid warrantless arrest under the hot pursuit exception?

What is the purpose of a tender of excluded evidence under Rule 132 of the Rules of Court?

How is a tender of excluded documentary evidence properly made during trial?

Learn more about these topics

1. Circumstantial Evidence Requisites
Under Rule 133, Section 4 of the Rules of Court, circumstantial evidence is sufficient for conviction if three essential requisites concur: first, there is more than one circumstance; second, the facts from which the inferences are derived are proven; and third, the combination of all circumstances produces a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain that leads to a fair and reasonable conclusion pointing to the accused, to the exclusion of all others, as the perpetrator of the crime.

2. Discretionary Bail Rules
Under Rule 114 of the Rules of Court, bail is a matter of judicial discretion in two principal instances: prior to conviction, when a person is charged with an offense punishable by reclusion perpetua, life imprisonment, or death and the evidence of guilt is not strong; and after conviction by the Regional Trial Court of an offense not punishable by death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment. In discretionary bail applications, the court must conduct a hearing to determine whether the evidence of guilt is strong before granting or denying bail.

3. Warrantless Arrest Exceptions
Under Rule 113, Section 5 of the Rules of Court, a peace officer or private person may make a valid warrantless arrest in three instances: in flagrante delicto, when the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense in the presence of the arresting officer or individual; hot pursuit, when an offense has just been committed and the arresting party has probable cause based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested committed it; and when an arrested prisoner has escaped from confinement.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026